EPYC 9384X
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
EPYC 9384X vs Ryzen 9 9950X3D Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9384X vs Ryzen 9 9950X3D FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9384X vs Ryzen 9 9950X3D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9384X
2023Why buy it
- ✅+2.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+500% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9950X3D across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.0 vs 100.4 PassMark/$ ($5,529 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ❌88.2% higher power demand at 320W vs 170W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 9950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.2% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,830 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 669.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 100.4 vs 13.0 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 320W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (2 Cores), while EPYC 9384X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (70,177 vs 72,121).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 768 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9384X, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 9950X3D better than EPYC 9384X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9384X vs Ryzen 9 9950X3D Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9384X
The EPYC 9384X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Genoa-X (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 72,121 points. Launch price was $5,529.
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
The Ryzen 9 9950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 70,177 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9384X packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen 9 9950X3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 9384X has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 9384X versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 9950X3D — a 37.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 9950X3D (base: 3.1 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The EPYC 9384X uses the Genoa-X (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 9 9950X3D uses Granite Ridge (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9384X scores 72,121 against the Ryzen 9 9950X3D's 70,177 — a 2.7% lead for the EPYC 9384X. L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 9384X vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 9950X3D.
| Feature | EPYC 9384X | Ryzen 9 9950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+100% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 5.7 GHz+46% |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz | 4.3 GHz+39% |
| L3 Cache | 768 MB (total)+500% | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Genoa-X (2023) | Granite Ridge (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 72,121+3% | 70,177 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 44,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 3,398 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 22,206 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9384X uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 9950X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9384X versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 9950X3D — the Ryzen 9 9950X3D supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9384X supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9384X) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 9950X3D). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9384X) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 9950X3D) — the EPYC 9384X offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9384X) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650 (Ryzen 9 9950X3D).
| Feature | EPYC 9384X | Ryzen 9 9950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | DDR5-5600+17% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 GB+3100% | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+500% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 9950X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9384X) vs true (Ryzen 9 9950X3D). The Ryzen 9 9950X3D includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (2 Cores)), while the EPYC 9384X requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 9384X rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Ryzen 9 9950X3D rivals Core Ultra 9 285K.
| Feature | EPYC 9384X | Ryzen 9 9950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Radeon Graphics (2 Cores) |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP | true |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9384X was priced at $5529, while the Ryzen 9 9950X3D came in at $699. On launch pricing ($5529 vs $699), Ryzen 9 9950X3D was $4830 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9384X delivers 13.0 pts/$ vs 100.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 9950X3D — making the Ryzen 9 9950X3D the 154% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9384X | Ryzen 9 9950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5529 | $699-87% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.0 | 100.4+672% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9384X and Ryzen 9 9950X3D
