EPYC 9354
EPYC 9384X
EPYC 9354 vs EPYC 9384X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9354 vs EPYC 9384X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9354 vs EPYC 9384X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9354
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,109 less on MSRP ($3,420 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 65.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.6 vs 13.0 PassMark/$ ($3,420 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 280W instead of 320W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 768 MB).
EPYC 9384X
2023Why buy it
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 256 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9354 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (72,121 vs 73,892).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.0 vs 21.6 PassMark/$ ($5,529 MSRP vs $3,420 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9354 better than EPYC 9384X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9354 vs EPYC 9384X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9354
The EPYC 9354 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 73,892 points. Launch price was $3,420.
EPYC 9384X
The EPYC 9384X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Genoa-X (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 72,121 points. Launch price was $5,529.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 9354 and EPYC 9384X share an identical 32-core/64-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 9354 versus 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 9384X — a 2.6% clock advantage for the EPYC 9384X (base: 3.25 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The EPYC 9354 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the EPYC 9384X uses Genoa-X (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9354 scores 73,892 against the EPYC 9384X's 72,121 — a 2.4% lead for the EPYC 9354. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9354 vs 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 9384X.
| Feature | EPYC 9354 | EPYC 9384X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 3.9 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 3.25 GHz+5% | 3.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 768 MB (total)+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Genoa-X (2023) |
| PassMark | 73,892+2% | 72,121 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. Both support up to 6144 of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9354) and SP5 (EPYC 9384X).
| Feature | EPYC 9354 | EPYC 9384X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 | 6144 |
| RAM Channels | 12 | 12 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 9354 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; EPYC 9384X rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.
| Feature | EPYC 9354 | EPYC 9384X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9354 was priced at $3420, while the EPYC 9384X came in at $5529. On launch pricing ($3420 vs $5529), EPYC 9354 was $2109 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9354 delivers 21.6 pts/$ vs 13.0 pts/$ for the EPYC 9384X — making the EPYC 9354 the 49.4% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9354 | EPYC 9384X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3420-38% | $5529 |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.6+66% | 13.0 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9354 and EPYC 9384X
