EPYC 9255 vs EPYC 9354

EPYC 9255 vs EPYC 9354 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9255

24 / 48

75,809

+2.6%

Ryzen 7 8840HX

Ryzen 9 7900X3D

Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

EPYC 9354

32 / 64

73,892

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9255 vs EPYC 9354 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9255 vs EPYC 9354: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9255

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $925 less on MSRP ($2,495 MSRP vs $3,420 MSRP).
✅Delivers 40.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.4 vs 21.6 PassMark/$ ($2,495 MSRP vs $3,420 MSRP).
✅Draws 200W instead of 280W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).

EPYC 9354

2022

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9255 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (73,892 vs 75,809).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.6 vs 30.4 PassMark/$ ($3,420 MSRP vs $2,495 MSRP).
❌40% higher power demand at 280W vs 200W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9255 better than EPYC 9354?

Yes. EPYC 9255 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9255 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9255 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.6% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9255 is the better buy right now. EPYC 9255 comes in $925 cheaper on MSRP at $2,495 MSRP versus $3,420 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 40.6% better value on MSRP (30.4 vs 21.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9255 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 32/64. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9255 vs EPYC 9354 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9255

The EPYC 9255 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.25 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 75,809 points. Launch price was $2,495.

EPYC 9354

The EPYC 9354 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 73,892 points. Launch price was $3,420.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9255 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the EPYC 9354 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 9354 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9255 versus 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 9354 — a 23.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9255 (base: 3.25 GHz vs 3.25 GHz). The EPYC 9255 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 9354 uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9255 scores 75,809 against the EPYC 9354's 73,892 — a 2.6% lead for the EPYC 9255. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9255 vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9354.

Feature	EPYC 9255	EPYC 9354
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	32 / 64+33%
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+26%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.25 GHz	3.25 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)	256 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm-20%	5 nm, 6 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Genoa (2022−2023)
PassMark	75,809+3%	73,892

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. Both support up to 6144 of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9255) and SP5 (EPYC 9354).

Feature	EPYC 9255	EPYC 9354
Socket	SP5	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	4800	4800
Max RAM Capacity	6144	6144
RAM Channels	12	12
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 9255 rivals Xeon Platinum 8480+; EPYC 9354 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.

Feature	EPYC 9255	EPYC 9354
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP	VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9255 was priced at $2495, while the EPYC 9354 came in at $3420. On launch pricing ($2495 vs $3420), EPYC 9255 was $925 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9255 delivers 30.4 pts/$ vs 21.6 pts/$ for the EPYC 9354 — making the EPYC 9255 the 33.8% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9255	EPYC 9354
MSRP	$2495-27%	$3420
Performance per Dollar	30.4+41%	21.6
Release Date	2024	2022

Search EPYC 9255 on Amazon

Search EPYC 9354 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.