EPYC 7C13
EPYC 9255
EPYC 7C13 vs EPYC 9255 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7C13 vs EPYC 9255 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7C13 vs EPYC 9255: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7C13
2021Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Costs $495 less on MSRP ($2,000 MSRP vs $2,495 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 25.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 30.4 PassMark/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $2,495 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9255 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 9255 moves to SP5 and DDR5.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
EPYC 9255
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 225W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (75,809 vs 76,363).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.4 vs 38.2 PassMark/$ ($2,495 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9255 better than EPYC 7C13?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7C13 vs EPYC 9255 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 7C13
The EPYC 7C13 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2021-03-01. It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.68 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 76,363 points. Launch price was $5,000.
EPYC 9255
The EPYC 9255 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.25 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 75,809 points. Launch price was $2,495.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7C13 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the EPYC 9255 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7C13 has 40 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.68 GHz on the EPYC 7C13 versus 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9255 — a 26.4% clock advantage for the EPYC 9255 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.25 GHz). The EPYC 7C13 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the EPYC 9255 uses Turin (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7C13 scores 76,363 against the EPYC 9255's 75,809 — a 0.7% lead for the EPYC 7C13. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7C13 vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9255.
| Feature | EPYC 7C13 | EPYC 9255 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+167% | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 3.68 GHz | 4.8 GHz+30% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 3.25 GHz+63% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+100% | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Turin (2024) |
| PassMark | 76,363 | 75,809 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,538 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 37,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7C13 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9255 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7C13 versus 4800 on the EPYC 9255 — the EPYC 9255 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9255 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7C13) vs 12 (EPYC 9255). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7C13) and SP5 (EPYC 9255).
| Feature | EPYC 7C13 | EPYC 9255 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB | 6144 GB+50% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 12+50% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 9255 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 7C13) vs VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9255). Primary use case: EPYC 7C13 targets Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7C13 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; EPYC 9255 rivals Xeon Platinum 8480+.
| Feature | EPYC 7C13 | EPYC 9255 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | Enterprise Server | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7C13 was priced at $2000, while the EPYC 9255 came in at $2495. On launch pricing ($2000 vs $2495), EPYC 7C13 was $495 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7C13 delivers 38.2 pts/$ vs 30.4 pts/$ for the EPYC 9255 — making the EPYC 7C13 the 22.7% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7C13 | EPYC 9255 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000-20% | $2495 |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.2+26% | 30.4 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7C13 and EPYC 9255
