EPYC 7C13
Xeon w9-3575X
EPYC 7C13 vs Xeon w9-3575X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7C13 vs Xeon w9-3575X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7C13 vs Xeon w9-3575X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7C13
2021Why buy it
- ✅+91.5% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+162.6% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 98 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,789 less on MSRP ($2,000 MSRP vs $3,789 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 75.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 21.8 PassMark/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $3,789 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 340W, a 115W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w9-3575X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon w9-3575X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon w9-3575X
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (19,320 vs 37,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (98 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.8 vs 38.2 PassMark/$ ($3,789 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ❌51.1% higher power demand at 340W vs 225W.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 7C13 better than Xeon w9-3575X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7C13 vs Xeon w9-3575X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 7C13
The EPYC 7C13 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2021-03-01. It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.68 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 76,363 points. Launch price was $5,000.
Xeon w9-3575X
The Xeon w9-3575X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 44 cores and 88 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 97.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 340 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 82,507 points. Launch price was $3,789.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7C13 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon w9-3575X offers 44 cores / 88 threads — the EPYC 7C13 has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.68 GHz on the EPYC 7C13 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3575X — a 26.4% clock advantage for the Xeon w9-3575X (base: 2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 7C13 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon w9-3575X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7C13 scores 76,363 against the Xeon w9-3575X's 82,507 — a 7.7% lead for the Xeon w9-3575X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,538 vs 2,300, a 39.7% lead for the Xeon w9-3575X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 37,000 vs 19,320 (62.8% advantage for the EPYC 7C13). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7C13 vs 97.5 MB on the Xeon w9-3575X.
| Feature | EPYC 7C13 | Xeon w9-3575X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+45% | 44 / 88 |
| Boost Clock | 3.68 GHz | 4.8 GHz+30% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz+10% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+163% | 97.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 76,363 | 82,507+8% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 60,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,538 | 2,300+50% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 37,000+92% | 19,320 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7C13 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w9-3575X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7C13 versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w9-3575X — the Xeon w9-3575X supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7C13) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3575X) — the EPYC 7C13 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7C13) and W790 (Xeon w9-3575X).
| Feature | EPYC 7C13 | Xeon w9-3575X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB | 4096 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+14% | 112 |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon w9-3575X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon w9-3575X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 7C13) vs true (Xeon w9-3575X). Primary use case: EPYC 7C13 targets Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7C13 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Xeon w9-3575X rivals Ryzen Threadripper 7970X.
| Feature | EPYC 7C13 | Xeon w9-3575X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Enterprise Server | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7C13 was priced at $2000, while the Xeon w9-3575X came in at $3789. On launch pricing ($2000 vs $3789), EPYC 7C13 was $1789 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7C13 delivers 38.2 pts/$ vs 21.8 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3575X — making the EPYC 7C13 the 54.7% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7C13 | Xeon w9-3575X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000-47% | $3789 |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.2+75% | 21.8 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7C13 and Xeon w9-3575X
