EPYC 7C13
EPYC 9374F
EPYC 7C13 vs EPYC 9374F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7C13 vs EPYC 9374F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7C13 vs EPYC 9374F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7C13
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,850 less on MSRP ($2,000 MSRP vs $4,850 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 125.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 16.9 PassMark/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $4,850 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 320W, a 95W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9374F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (76,363 vs 82,009).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 9374F moves to SP5 and DDR5.
EPYC 9374F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +37.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 38.2 PassMark/$ ($4,850 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ❌42.2% higher power demand at 320W vs 225W.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9374F better than EPYC 7C13?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7C13 vs EPYC 9374F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 7C13
The EPYC 7C13 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2021-03-01. It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.68 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 76,363 points. Launch price was $5,000.
EPYC 9374F
The EPYC 9374F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 82,009 points. Launch price was $4,850.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7C13 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the EPYC 9374F offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7C13 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.68 GHz on the EPYC 7C13 versus 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9374F — a 15.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 9374F (base: 2 GHz vs 3.85 GHz). The EPYC 7C13 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the EPYC 9374F uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7C13 scores 76,363 against the EPYC 9374F's 82,009 — a 7.1% lead for the EPYC 9374F. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 7C13 | EPYC 9374F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+100% | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 3.68 GHz | 4.3 GHz+17% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 3.85 GHz+93% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 256 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 76,363 | 82,009+7% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,538 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 37,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7C13 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9374F uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7C13 versus 4800 on the EPYC 9374F — the EPYC 9374F supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9374F supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7C13) vs 12 (EPYC 9374F). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7C13) and SP5 (EPYC 9374F).
| Feature | EPYC 7C13 | EPYC 9374F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB | 6144 GB+50% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 12+50% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 9374F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 7C13) vs VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9374F). Primary use case: EPYC 7C13 targets Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7C13 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; EPYC 9374F rivals Xeon Platinum 8480+.
| Feature | EPYC 7C13 | EPYC 9374F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | Enterprise Server | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7C13 was priced at $2000, while the EPYC 9374F came in at $4850. On launch pricing ($2000 vs $4850), EPYC 7C13 was $2850 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7C13 delivers 38.2 pts/$ vs 16.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 9374F — making the EPYC 7C13 the 77.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7C13 | EPYC 9374F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000-59% | $4850 |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.2+126% | 16.9 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7C13 and EPYC 9374F
