EPYC 7C13
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
EPYC 7C13 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7C13 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7C13 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7C13
2021Why buy it
- ✅+24.4% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Costs $495 less on MSRP ($2,000 MSRP vs $2,495 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 27.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 30.1 PassMark/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $2,495 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 280W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +45.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (29,745 vs 37,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.1 vs 38.2 PassMark/$ ($2,495 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ❌24.4% higher power demand at 280W vs 225W.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 7C13 better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7C13 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 7C13
The EPYC 7C13 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2021-03-01. It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.68 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 76,363 points. Launch price was $5,000.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 74,985 points. Launch price was $3,299.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7C13 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7C13 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.68 GHz on the EPYC 7C13 versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX — a 20% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX (base: 2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 7C13 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7C13 scores 76,363 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX's 74,985 — a 1.8% lead for the EPYC 7C13. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,538 vs 1,686, a 9.2% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 37,000 vs 29,745 (21.7% advantage for the EPYC 7C13). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7C13 vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX.
| Feature | EPYC 7C13 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+100% | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 3.68 GHz | 4.5 GHz+22% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 3.6 GHz+80% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+100% | 128 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Chagall PRO (2022) |
| PassMark | 76,363+2% | 74,985 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 53,977 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,538 | 1,686+10% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 37,000+24% | 29,745 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7C13 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The EPYC 7C13 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7C13) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX).
| Feature | EPYC 7C13 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+100% | 2048 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 7C13) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX). Primary use case: EPYC 7C13 targets Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7C13 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX rivals Xeon Gold 6338.
| Feature | EPYC 7C13 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Enterprise Server | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7C13 was priced at $2000, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX came in at $2495. On launch pricing ($2000 vs $2495), EPYC 7C13 was $495 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7C13 delivers 38.2 pts/$ vs 30.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX — making the EPYC 7C13 the 23.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7C13 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000-20% | $2495 |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.2+27% | 30.1 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7C13 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
