
EPYC 7C13 vs Xeon 6737P

EPYC 7C13

Xeon 6737P
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7C13
Performance Per Dollar Xeon 6737P
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 7C13 | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($2,000) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,995) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Granite Rapids (2024−2025) / Intel 3 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 7C13 | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+139%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($2,000) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,995) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7C13 and Xeon 6737P

EPYC 7C13
The EPYC 7C13 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2021-03-01. It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.68 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 76,363 points. Launch price was $5,000.

Xeon 6737P
The Xeon 6737P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 79,634 points. Launch price was $4,995.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7C13 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon 6737P offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7C13 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.68 GHz on the EPYC 7C13 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon 6737P — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Xeon 6737P (base: 2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The EPYC 7C13 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon 6737P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7C13 scores 76,363 against the Xeon 6737P's 79,634 — a 4.2% lead for the Xeon 6737P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,538 vs 2,000, a 26.1% lead for the Xeon 6737P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 37,000 vs 45,000 (19.5% advantage for the Xeon 6737P). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7C13 vs 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6737P.
| Feature | EPYC 7C13 | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+100% | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 3.68 GHz | 4 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.9 GHz+45% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+78% | 144 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm | Intel 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 76,363 | 79,634+4% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,538 | 2,000+30% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 37,000 | 45,000+22% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7C13 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6737P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7C13 versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6737P — the Xeon 6737P supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7C13) vs 88 (Xeon 6737P) — the EPYC 7C13 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7C13) and C741 (Xeon 6737P).
| Feature | EPYC 7C13 | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-6400+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB | 4096 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+45% | 88 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon 6737P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 7C13) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6737P). Primary use case: EPYC 7C13 targets Enterprise Server, Xeon 6737P targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7C13 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Xeon 6737P rivals EPYC 9005.
| Feature | EPYC 7C13 | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Enterprise Server | High Performance Server |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7C13 launched at $2000 MSRP, while the Xeon 6737P debuted at $4995. At current prices ($2000 vs $4995), the EPYC 7C13 is $2995 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7C13 delivers 38.2 pts/$ vs 15.9 pts/$ for the Xeon 6737P — making the EPYC 7C13 the 82.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7C13 | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000-60% | $4995 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2000-60% | $4995 |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.2+140% | 15.9 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.

















