EPYC 7C13 vs Xeon 6740E

AMD

EPYC 7C13

64 Cores128 Thrd225 WWMax: 3.68 GHz2021
EPYC family
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon 6740E

96 Cores96 Thrd250 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2024
Similar parts
·······

EPYC 7C13 vs Xeon 6740E Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7C13 vs Xeon 6740E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7C13 vs Xeon 6740E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7C13

2021

Why buy it

  • +166.7% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 96 MB).
  • Costs $3,265 less on MSRP ($2,000 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
  • Delivers 163.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 14.5 PassMark/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
  • Draws 225W instead of 250W, a 25W reduction.
  • 60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon 6740E moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
  • No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon 6740E

2024

Why buy it

  • Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
  • AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (76,167 vs 76,363).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (96 MB vs 256 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.5 vs 38.2 PassMark/$ ($5,265 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7C13 better than Xeon 6740E?
Yes. EPYC 7C13 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, EPYC 7C13 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7C13 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 96 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 7C13 is the better buy right now. EPYC 7C13 comes in $3,265 cheaper on MSRP at $2,000 MSRP versus $5,265 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 163.9% better value on MSRP (38.2 vs 14.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon 6740E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA4710 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7C13 vs Xeon 6740E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 7C13

The EPYC 7C13 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2021-03-01. It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.68 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 76,363 points. Launch price was $5,000.

Intel

Xeon 6740E

The Xeon 6740E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture. It features 96 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB (per module). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 76,167 points. Launch price was $5,265.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7C13 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon 6740E offers 96 cores / 96 threads — the Xeon 6740E has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.68 GHz on the EPYC 7C13 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon 6740E — a 14% clock advantage for the EPYC 7C13 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 7C13 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon 6740E uses Sierra Forest (2024) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7C13 scores 76,363 against the Xeon 6740E's 76,167 — a 0.3% lead for the EPYC 7C13. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7C13 vs 96 MB (total) on the Xeon 6740E.

FeatureEPYC 7C13Xeon 6740E
Cores / Threads
64 / 128
96 / 96+50%
Boost Clock
3.68 GHz+15%
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.4 GHz+20%
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)+167%
96 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
4 MB (per module)+700%
Process
7 nm
Intel 3 nm-57%
Architecture
Milan (2021−2023)
Sierra Forest (2024)
PassMark
76,363
76,167
Geekbench 6 Single
1,538
Geekbench 6 Multi
37,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7C13 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6740E uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7C13 versus 6400 on the Xeon 6740E — the Xeon 6740E supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7C13) vs 80 (Xeon 6740E) — the EPYC 7C13 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7C13) and C741 (Xeon 6740E).

FeatureEPYC 7C13Xeon 6740E
Socket
SP3
LGA4710
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
6400+100%
Max RAM Capacity
4096 GB
4096 GB
RAM Channels
8
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128+60%
80
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon 6740E supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 7C13) vs VT-x, VT-d, TDX (Xeon 6740E). Primary use case: EPYC 7C13 targets Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7C13 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Xeon 6740E rivals EPYC 9005.

FeatureEPYC 7C13Xeon 6740E
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d, TDX
Target Use
Enterprise Server
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7C13 was priced at $2000, while the Xeon 6740E came in at $5265. On launch pricing ($2000 vs $5265), EPYC 7C13 was $3265 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7C13 delivers 38.2 pts/$ vs 14.5 pts/$ for the Xeon 6740E — making the EPYC 7C13 the 90.1% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 7C13Xeon 6740E
MSRP
$2000-62%
$5265
Performance per Dollar
38.2+163%
14.5
Release Date
2021
2024

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.