EPYC 7C13 vs Xeon Platinum 8461V

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7C13

64 Cores128 Thrd225 WWMax: 3.68 GHz2021

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Platinum 8461V

48 Cores96 Thrd300 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2023

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7C13 vs Xeon Platinum 8461V Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7C13

64 / 128

76,363

+1.8%

Ryzen 7 8840HX

Ryzen 9 8940HX

Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Xeon Platinum 8461V

48 / 96

74,982

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7C13 vs Xeon Platinum 8461V FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7C13 vs Xeon Platinum 8461V: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7C13

2021

Why buy it

✅+1.8% higher PassMark.
✅+162.6% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 98 MB).
✅Costs $2,491 less on MSRP ($2,000 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
✅Delivers 128.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 16.7 PassMark/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
✅Draws 225W instead of 300W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8461V across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8461V moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Platinum 8461V

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (74,982 vs 76,363).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (98 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.7 vs 38.2 PassMark/$ ($4,491 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 300W vs 225W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7C13 better than Xeon Platinum 8461V?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Platinum 8461V is ahead with a 7.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7C13 pulls ahead with 1.8% better PassMark. EPYC 7C13 also has the bigger cache pool with 162.6% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 98 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7C13 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.8% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 162.6% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 98 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7C13 is the better buy right now. EPYC 7C13 comes in $2,491 cheaper on MSRP at $2,000 MSRP versus $4,491 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon Platinum 8461V is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 7.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 128.7% better value on MSRP (38.2 vs 16.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8461V makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7C13 vs Xeon Platinum 8461V Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7C13

The EPYC 7C13 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2021-03-01. It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.68 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 76,363 points. Launch price was $5,000.

Xeon Platinum 8461V

The Xeon Platinum 8461V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 97.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 74,982 points. Launch price was $4,491.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7C13 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8461V offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the EPYC 7C13 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.68 GHz on the EPYC 7C13 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8461V — a 0.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8461V (base: 2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 7C13 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8461V uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7C13 scores 76,363 against the Xeon Platinum 8461V's 74,982 — a 1.8% lead for the EPYC 7C13. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7C13 vs 97.5 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8461V.

Feature	EPYC 7C13	Xeon Platinum 8461V
Cores / Threads	64 / 128+33%	48 / 96
Boost Clock	3.68 GHz	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.2 GHz+10%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+163%	97.5 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	76,363+2%	74,982
Geekbench 6 Single	1,538	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	37,000	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7C13 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8461V uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7C13 versus 4800 on the Xeon Platinum 8461V — the Xeon Platinum 8461V supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7C13) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8461V) — the EPYC 7C13 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7C13) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8461V).

Feature	EPYC 7C13	Xeon Platinum 8461V
Socket	SP3	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB	4096 GB
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Platinum 8461V supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 7C13) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8461V). Primary use case: EPYC 7C13 targets Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7C13 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Xeon Platinum 8461V rivals EPYC 9454.

Feature	EPYC 7C13	Xeon Platinum 8461V
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Enterprise Server	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7C13 was priced at $2000, while the Xeon Platinum 8461V came in at $4491. On launch pricing ($2000 vs $4491), EPYC 7C13 was $2491 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7C13 delivers 38.2 pts/$ vs 16.7 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8461V — making the EPYC 7C13 the 78.3% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7C13	Xeon Platinum 8461V
MSRP	$2000-55%	$4491
Performance per Dollar	38.2+129%	16.7
Release Date	2021	2023

Search EPYC 7C13 on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8461V on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.