EPYC 7C13 vs EPYC 7713P

AMD

EPYC 7C13

64 Cores128 Thrd225 WWMax: 3.68 GHz2021
EPYC family
·······
VS
AMD

EPYC 7713P

64 Cores128 Thrd225 WWMax: 3.68 GHz2021
EPYC family
·······

EPYC 7C13 vs EPYC 7713P Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7C13 vs EPYC 7713P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7C13 vs EPYC 7713P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7C13

2021

Why buy it

  • Costs $3,010 less on MSRP ($2,000 MSRP vs $5,010 MSRP).
  • Delivers 134.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 16.3 PassMark/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $5,010 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (76,363 vs 81,582).

EPYC 7713P

2021

Why buy it

  • +6.8% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.3 vs 38.2 PassMark/$ ($5,010 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7713P better than EPYC 7C13?
Yes. EPYC 7713P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 6.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7713P is the stronger fit. You are getting 6.8% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 7713P is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7C13 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 7713P comes in 150.5% more expensive on MSRP at $5,010 MSRP versus $2,000 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7C13 is also 134.5% better value on MSRP (38.2 vs 16.3 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7713P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 64 cores / 128 threads instead of 64/128. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 7C13 vs EPYC 7713P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 7C13

The EPYC 7C13 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2021-03-01. It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.68 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 76,363 points. Launch price was $5,000.

AMD

EPYC 7713P

The EPYC 7713P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.68 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 81,582 points. Launch price was $5,010.

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 7C13 and EPYC 7713P share an identical 64-core/128-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.68 GHz on the EPYC 7C13 versus 3.68 GHz on the EPYC 7713P — identical boost frequencies (base: 2 GHz vs 2 GHz). Both are built on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture using a 7 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 7C13 scores 76,363 against the EPYC 7713P's 81,582 — a 6.6% lead for the EPYC 7713P. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureEPYC 7C13EPYC 7713P
Cores / Threads
64 / 128
64 / 128
Boost Clock
3.68 GHz
3.68 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
2 GHz
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)
256 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
512 kB (per core)
Process
7 nm
7 nm+
Architecture
Milan (2021−2023)
Milan (2021−2023)
PassMark
76,363
81,582+7%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,538
Geekbench 6 Multi
37,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP3 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7C13) and SP3 (EPYC 7713P).

FeatureEPYC 7C13EPYC 7713P
Socket
SP3
SP3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
3200
Max RAM Capacity
4096 GB
4096 GB
RAM Channels
8
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 7C13) vs VT-x, VT-d, SEV (EPYC 7713P). Primary use case: EPYC 7C13 targets Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7C13 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; EPYC 7713P rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.

FeatureEPYC 7C13EPYC 7713P
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d, SEV
Target Use
Enterprise Server
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7C13 was priced at $2000, while the EPYC 7713P came in at $5010. On launch pricing ($2000 vs $5010), EPYC 7C13 was $3010 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7C13 delivers 38.2 pts/$ vs 16.3 pts/$ for the EPYC 7713P — making the EPYC 7C13 the 80.4% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 7C13EPYC 7713P
MSRP
$2000-60%
$5010
Performance per Dollar
38.2+134%
16.3
Release Date
2021
2021

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.