EPYC 7C13
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
EPYC 7C13 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7C13 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7C13 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7C13
2021Why buy it
- ✅+58.8% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Costs $649 less on MSRP ($2,000 MSRP vs $2,649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 22.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 31.1 PassMark/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $2,649 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 350W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +36.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (23,294 vs 37,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 31.1 vs 38.2 PassMark/$ ($2,649 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ❌55.6% higher power demand at 350W vs 225W.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 7C13 better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7C13 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 7C13
The EPYC 7C13 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2021-03-01. It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.68 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 76,363 points. Launch price was $5,000.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 82,268 points. Launch price was $2,649.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7C13 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7C13 has 40 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.68 GHz on the EPYC 7C13 versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX — a 36.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX (base: 2 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The EPYC 7C13 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7C13 scores 76,363 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX's 82,268 — a 7.4% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,538 vs 2,686, a 54.4% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 37,000 vs 23,294 (45.5% advantage for the EPYC 7C13). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7C13 vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX.
| Feature | EPYC 7C13 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+167% | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 3.68 GHz | 5.3 GHz+44% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 4.2 GHz+110% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+100% | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Storm Peak (2023) |
| PassMark | 76,363 | 82,268+8% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 38,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,538 | 2,686+75% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 37,000+59% | 23,294 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7C13 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7C13 versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX supports 62.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7C13 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7C13) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX).
| Feature | EPYC 7C13 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5200+63% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+100% | 2048 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 7C13) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX). Primary use case: EPYC 7C13 targets Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7C13 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.
| Feature | EPYC 7C13 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Enterprise Server | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7C13 was priced at $2000, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX came in at $2649. On launch pricing ($2000 vs $2649), EPYC 7C13 was $649 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7C13 delivers 38.2 pts/$ vs 31.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX — making the EPYC 7C13 the 20.6% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7C13 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000-24% | $2649 |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.2+23% | 31.1 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7C13 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
