EPYC 9255
EPYC 9274F
EPYC 9255 vs EPYC 9274F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9255 vs EPYC 9274F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9255 vs EPYC 9274F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9255
2024Why buy it
- ✅+2.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $565 less on MSRP ($2,495 MSRP vs $3,060 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 25.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.4 vs 24.2 PassMark/$ ($2,495 MSRP vs $3,060 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 320W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9274F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
EPYC 9274F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (73,982 vs 75,809).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.2 vs 30.4 PassMark/$ ($3,060 MSRP vs $2,495 MSRP).
- ❌60% higher power demand at 320W vs 200W.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9255 better than EPYC 9274F?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9255 vs EPYC 9274F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9255
The EPYC 9255 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.25 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 75,809 points. Launch price was $2,495.
EPYC 9274F
The EPYC 9274F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.05 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 73,982 points. Launch price was $3,060.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 9255 and EPYC 9274F share an identical 24-core/48-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9255 versus 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9274F — a 11% clock advantage for the EPYC 9255 (base: 3.25 GHz vs 4.05 GHz). The EPYC 9255 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 9274F uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9255 scores 75,809 against the EPYC 9274F's 73,982 — a 2.4% lead for the EPYC 9255. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9255 vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9274F.
| Feature | EPYC 9255 | EPYC 9274F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+12% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.25 GHz | 4.05 GHz+25% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 256 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-20% | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 75,809+2% | 73,982 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. Both support up to 6144 of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9255) and SP5 (EPYC 9274F).
| Feature | EPYC 9255 | EPYC 9274F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 | 6144 |
| RAM Channels | 12 | 12 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 9255 rivals Xeon Platinum 8480+; EPYC 9274F rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.
| Feature | EPYC 9255 | EPYC 9274F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9255 was priced at $2495, while the EPYC 9274F came in at $3060. On launch pricing ($2495 vs $3060), EPYC 9255 was $565 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9255 delivers 30.4 pts/$ vs 24.2 pts/$ for the EPYC 9274F — making the EPYC 9255 the 22.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9255 | EPYC 9274F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2495-18% | $3060 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.4+26% | 24.2 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9255 and EPYC 9274F
