EPYC 9255
Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
EPYC 9255 vs Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9255 vs Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9255 vs Xeon Platinum 8568Y+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9255
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,002 less on MSRP ($2,495 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 147.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.4 vs 12.3 PassMark/$ ($2,495 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 350W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (75,809 vs 79,683).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 300 MB).
Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
2023Why buy it
- ✅+5.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+134.4% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 128 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9255 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.3 vs 30.4 PassMark/$ ($6,497 MSRP vs $2,495 MSRP).
- ❌75% higher power demand at 350W vs 200W.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9255 better than Xeon Platinum 8568Y+?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9255 vs Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9255
The EPYC 9255 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.25 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 75,809 points. Launch price was $2,495.
Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
The Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 79,683 points. Launch price was $6,497.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9255 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9255 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ — a 18.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 9255 (base: 3.25 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The EPYC 9255 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9255 scores 75,809 against the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+'s 79,683 — a 5% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9255 vs 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+.
| Feature | EPYC 9255 | Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 48 / 96+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+20% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.25 GHz+41% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 300 MB (total)+134% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm-60% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 75,809 | 79,683+5% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,961 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 55,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9255 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9255 versus DDR5-5600 on the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ — the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9255 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9255) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8568Y+). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9255) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8568Y+) — the EPYC 9255 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9255) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8568Y+).
| Feature | EPYC 9255 | Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | DDR5-5600+17% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 GB+50% | 4096 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9255) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8568Y+). Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9255 rivals Xeon Platinum 8480+; Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ rivals EPYC 9554.
| Feature | EPYC 9255 | Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | High Performance Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9255 was priced at $2495, while the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ came in at $6497. On launch pricing ($2495 vs $6497), EPYC 9255 was $4002 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9255 delivers 30.4 pts/$ vs 12.3 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ — making the EPYC 9255 the 85% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9255 | Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2495-62% | $6497 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.4+147% | 12.3 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9255 and Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
