Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

EPYC 9255 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

EPYC 9255

24 Cores48 Thrd200 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024
EPYC family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

32 Cores64 Thrd280 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2022
Threadripper Pro family
···
Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9255 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9255
24 / 48
75,809
+1.1%
brand logoRyzen 7 8840HX
brand logoRyzen 9 7900X3D
brand logoRyzen 9 7945HX3D
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9960X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7970X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7980X
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
32 / 64
74,985
0.0%
brand logoRyzen AI Max 390
brand logoRyzen 9 7900X3D
brand logoRyzen 9 7945HX3D
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9960X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7970X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7980X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9255 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
EPYC 9255
low303 FPS
medium280 FPS
high231 FPS
ultra195 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
low223 FPS
medium184 FPS
high156 FPS
ultra114 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
EPYC 9255
low717 FPS
medium614 FPS
high485 FPS
ultra421 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
low777 FPS
medium660 FPS
high516 FPS
ultra447 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
EPYC 9255
low850 FPS
medium691 FPS
high625 FPS
ultra530 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
low783 FPS
medium661 FPS
high604 FPS
ultra528 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
EPYC 9255
low1083 FPS
medium982 FPS
high862 FPS
ultra777 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
low1212 FPS
medium1015 FPS
high924 FPS
ultra818 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
EPYC 9255
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
EPYC 9255
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
EPYC 9255
low299 FPS
medium229 FPS
high206 FPS
ultra186 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
low315 FPS
medium243 FPS
high222 FPS
ultra199 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
EPYC 9255
low272 FPS
medium239 FPS
high188 FPS
ultra151 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
low327 FPS
medium288 FPS
high228 FPS
ultra192 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
EPYC 9255
low367 FPS
medium328 FPS
high285 FPS
ultra244 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
low369 FPS
medium328 FPS
high285 FPS
ultra243 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
EPYC 9255
low283 FPS
medium264 FPS
high223 FPS
ultra209 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
low283 FPS
medium262 FPS
high221 FPS
ultra207 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

EPYC 9255 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9255

2024

Why buy it

  • ✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
  • ✅Draws 200W instead of 280W, a 80W reduction.
  • ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

2022

Why buy it

  • ✅Better for gaming: +18.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (74,985 vs 75,809).
  • ❌40% higher power demand at 280W vs 200W.
  • ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while EPYC 9255 moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9255 better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is ahead with a 18.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9255 pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9255 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 9255 is the better buy right now. EPYC 9255 comes in in basically the same MSRP band at $2,495 MSRP versus $2,495 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 18.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1.1% better value on MSRP (30.4 vs 30.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9255 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of sWRX8, more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 32/64, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9255 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 9255

The EPYC 9255 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.25 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 75,809 points. Launch price was $2,495.

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 74,985 points. Launch price was $3,299.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9255 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9255 versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX — a 6.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 9255 (base: 3.25 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 9255 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9255 scores 75,809 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX's 74,985 — a 1.1% lead for the EPYC 9255. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9255 vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX.

FeatureEPYC 9255Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Cores / Threads
24 / 48
32 / 64+33%
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz+7%
4.5 GHz
Base Clock
3.25 GHz
3.6 GHz+11%
L3 Cache
128 MB (total)
128 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
512K (per core)+51100%
Process
4 nm-43%
7 nm
Architecture
Turin (2024)
Chagall PRO (2022)
PassMark
75,809+1%
74,985
Cinebench R23 Multi
—
53,977
Geekbench 6 Single
—
1,686
Geekbench 6 Multi
—
29,745
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9255 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9255 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX — the EPYC 9255 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9255 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9255) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9255) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX).

FeatureEPYC 9255Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Socket
SP5
sWRX8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
4800+50%
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
6144 GB+200%
2048 GB
RAM Channels
12+50%
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 9255 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9255) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX). Direct competitor: EPYC 9255 rivals Xeon Platinum 8480+; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX rivals Xeon Gold 6338.

FeatureEPYC 9255Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP
true
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9255 was priced at $2495, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX came in at $2495. On launch pricing ($2495 vs $2495), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX was $0 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9255 delivers 30.4 pts/$ vs 30.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX — making the EPYC 9255 the 1.1% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9255Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
MSRP
$2495
$2495
Performance per Dollar
30.4
30.1
Release Date
2024
2022
Search EPYC 9255 on AmazonSearch Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.