EPYC 7713P vs EPYC 9255

EPYC 7713P vs EPYC 9255 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7713P

64 / 128

81,582

+7.6%

Ryzen 9 5950X

Ryzen 9 9900X

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

EPYC 9255

24 / 48

75,809

0.0%

Ryzen 7 8840HX

Ryzen 9 7900X3D

Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7713P vs EPYC 9255 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7713P vs EPYC 9255: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7713P

2021

Why buy it

✅+7.6% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9255 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.3 vs 30.4 PassMark/$ ($5,010 MSRP vs $2,495 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 9255 moves to SP5 and DDR5.

EPYC 9255

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,515 less on MSRP ($2,495 MSRP vs $5,010 MSRP).
✅Delivers 86.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.4 vs 16.3 PassMark/$ ($2,495 MSRP vs $5,010 MSRP).
✅Draws 200W instead of 225W, a 25W reduction.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (75,809 vs 81,582).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9255 better than EPYC 7713P?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 9255 is ahead with a 22.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7713P pulls ahead with 7.6% better PassMark. EPYC 7713P also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7713P is the stronger fit. You are getting 7.6% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9255 is the better buy right now. EPYC 9255 comes in $2,515 cheaper on MSRP at $2,495 MSRP versus $5,010 MSRP, and it still gives you a 22.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 7713P is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 7.6% better PassMark. It is also 86.6% better value on MSRP (30.4 vs 16.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9255 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2021), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7713P vs EPYC 9255 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7713P

The EPYC 7713P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.68 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 81,582 points. Launch price was $5,010.

EPYC 9255

The EPYC 9255 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.25 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 75,809 points. Launch price was $2,495.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7713P packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the EPYC 9255 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7713P has 40 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.68 GHz on the EPYC 7713P versus 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9255 — a 26.4% clock advantage for the EPYC 9255 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.25 GHz). The EPYC 7713P uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the EPYC 9255 uses Turin (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7713P scores 81,582 against the EPYC 9255's 75,809 — a 7.3% lead for the EPYC 7713P. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7713P vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9255.

Feature	EPYC 7713P	EPYC 9255
Cores / Threads	64 / 128+167%	24 / 48
Boost Clock	3.68 GHz	4.8 GHz+30%
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.25 GHz+63%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+100%	128 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm+	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Turin (2024)
PassMark	81,582+8%	75,809

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7713P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9255 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7713P versus 4800 on the EPYC 9255 — the EPYC 9255 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9255 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7713P) vs 12 (EPYC 9255). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7713P) and SP5 (EPYC 9255).

Feature	EPYC 7713P	EPYC 9255
Socket	SP3	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200	4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4096	6144+50%
RAM Channels	8	12+50%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 9255 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV (EPYC 7713P) vs VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9255). Direct competitor: EPYC 7713P rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; EPYC 9255 rivals Xeon Platinum 8480+.

Feature	EPYC 7713P	EPYC 9255
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, SEV	VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7713P was priced at $5010, while the EPYC 9255 came in at $2495. On launch pricing ($5010 vs $2495), EPYC 9255 was $2515 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7713P delivers 16.3 pts/$ vs 30.4 pts/$ for the EPYC 9255 — making the EPYC 9255 the 60.4% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7713P	EPYC 9255
MSRP	$5010	$2495-50%
Performance per Dollar	16.3	30.4+87%
Release Date	2021	2024

Search EPYC 7713P on Amazon

Search EPYC 9255 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.