EPYC 7713P vs EPYC 9374F

The EPYC 7713P packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the EPYC 9374F offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7713P has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.68 GHz on the EPYC 7713P versus 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9374F — a 15.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 9374F (base: 2 GHz vs 3.85 GHz). The EPYC 7713P uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the EPYC 9374F uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7713P scores 81,582 against the EPYC 9374F's 82,009 — a 0.5% lead for the EPYC 9374F. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.

The EPYC 7713P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9374F uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7713P versus 4800 on the EPYC 9374F — the EPYC 9374F supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9374F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7713P) vs 12 (EPYC 9374F). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7713P) and SP5 (EPYC 9374F).

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 9374F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV (EPYC 7713P) vs VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9374F). Direct competitor: EPYC 7713P rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; EPYC 9374F rivals Xeon Platinum 8480+.

The EPYC 7713P launched at $5010 MSRP, while the EPYC 9374F debuted at $4850. At current prices ($2443 vs $3466), the EPYC 7713P is $1023 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7713P delivers 33.4 pts/$ vs 23.7 pts/$ for the EPYC 9374F — making the EPYC 7713P the 34.1% better value option.