EPYC 7663 vs EPYC 7713P

AMD

EPYC 7663

56 Cores112 Thrd240 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2021
EPYC family
·······
VS
AMD

EPYC 7713P

64 Cores128 Thrd225 WWMax: 3.68 GHz2021
EPYC family
·······

EPYC 7663 vs EPYC 7713P Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7663 vs EPYC 7713P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7663 vs EPYC 7713P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7663

2021

Why buy it

  • +0.7% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.9 vs 16.3 PassMark/$ ($6,366 MSRP vs $5,010 MSRP).

EPYC 7713P

2021

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,356 less on MSRP ($5,010 MSRP vs $6,366 MSRP).
  • Delivers 26.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.3 vs 12.9 PassMark/$ ($5,010 MSRP vs $6,366 MSRP).
  • Draws 225W instead of 240W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (81,582 vs 82,120).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7713P better than EPYC 7663?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 7713P is ahead with a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7663 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7663 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 56 cores and 112 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 7713P is the better buy right now. EPYC 7713P comes in $1,356 cheaper on MSRP at $5,010 MSRP versus $6,366 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 7663 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.7% better PassMark. It is also 26.2% better value on MSRP (16.3 vs 12.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7713P is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

EPYC 7663 vs EPYC 7713P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 7663

The EPYC 7663 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 82,120 points. Launch price was $6,366.

AMD

EPYC 7713P

The EPYC 7713P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.68 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 81,582 points. Launch price was $5,010.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7663 packs 56 cores / 112 threads, while the EPYC 7713P offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 7713P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the EPYC 7663 versus 3.68 GHz on the EPYC 7713P — a 5% clock advantage for the EPYC 7713P (base: 2 GHz vs 2 GHz). Both are built on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture using a 7 nm+ process. In PassMark, the EPYC 7663 scores 82,120 against the EPYC 7713P's 81,582 — a 0.7% lead for the EPYC 7663. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureEPYC 7663EPYC 7713P
Cores / Threads
56 / 112
64 / 128+14%
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz
3.68 GHz+5%
Base Clock
2 GHz
2 GHz
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)
256 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
512 kB (per core)
Process
7 nm+
7 nm+
Architecture
Milan (2021−2023)
Milan (2021−2023)
PassMark
82,120
81,582
Geekbench 6 Single
1,370
Geekbench 6 Multi
12,380
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP3 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7663) and SP3 (EPYC 7713P).

FeatureEPYC 7663EPYC 7713P
Socket
SP3
SP3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
3200
Max RAM Capacity
4096 GB
4096 GB
RAM Channels
8
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 7663) vs VT-x, VT-d, SEV (EPYC 7713P). Primary use case: EPYC 7663 targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7663 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; EPYC 7713P rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.

FeatureEPYC 7663EPYC 7713P
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d, SEV
Target Use
Server
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7663 was priced at $6366, while the EPYC 7713P came in at $5010. On launch pricing ($6366 vs $5010), EPYC 7713P was $1356 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7663 delivers 12.9 pts/$ vs 16.3 pts/$ for the EPYC 7713P — making the EPYC 7713P the 23.2% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 7663EPYC 7713P
MSRP
$6366
$5010-21%
Performance per Dollar
12.9
16.3+26%
Release Date
2021
2021

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.