EPYC 7663 vs Xeon Platinum 8592+

AMD

EPYC 7663

56 Cores112 Thrd240 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2021
EPYC family
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon Platinum 8592+

64 Cores128 Thrd350 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2023
Similar parts

EPYC 7663 vs Xeon Platinum 8592+ Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7663 vs Xeon Platinum 8592+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7663 vs Xeon Platinum 8592+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7663

2021

Why buy it

  • Costs $5,234 less on MSRP ($6,366 MSRP vs $11,600 MSRP).
  • Delivers 78.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.9 vs 7.2 PassMark/$ ($6,366 MSRP vs $11,600 MSRP).
  • Draws 240W instead of 350W, a 110W reduction.
  • 60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (82,120 vs 84,013).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 320 MB).
  • Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8592+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon Platinum 8592+

2023

Why buy it

  • +25% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 256 MB).
  • Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
  • AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 12.9 PassMark/$ ($11,600 MSRP vs $6,366 MSRP).
  • 45.8% higher power demand at 350W vs 240W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8592+ better than EPYC 7663?
Yes. Xeon Platinum 8592+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon Platinum 8592+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8592+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.3% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 256 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon Platinum 8592+ is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7663 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Platinum 8592+ comes in 82.2% more expensive on MSRP at $11,600 MSRP versus $6,366 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7663 is also 78.1% better value on MSRP (12.9 vs 7.2 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Platinum 8592+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of SP3, 25% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 256 MB), more multi-core headroom with 64 cores / 128 threads instead of 56/112, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7663 vs Xeon Platinum 8592+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 7663

The EPYC 7663 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 82,120 points. Launch price was $6,366.

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8592+

The Xeon Platinum 8592+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 320 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 84,013 points. Launch price was $11,600.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7663 packs 56 cores / 112 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8592+ has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the EPYC 7663 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8592+ — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8592+ (base: 2 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The EPYC 7663 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7663 scores 82,120 against the Xeon Platinum 8592+'s 84,013 — a 2.3% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8592+. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7663 vs 320 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8592+.

FeatureEPYC 7663Xeon Platinum 8592+
Cores / Threads
56 / 112
64 / 128+14%
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz
3.9 GHz+11%
Base Clock
2 GHz+5%
1.9 GHz
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)
320 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
2 MB (per core)+300%
Process
7 nm+-30%
10 nm
Architecture
Milan (2021−2023)
Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark
82,120
84,013+2%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,370
Geekbench 6 Multi
12,380
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7663 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7663 versus 5600 on the Xeon Platinum 8592+ — the Xeon Platinum 8592+ supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7663) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8592+) — the EPYC 7663 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7663) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8592+).

FeatureEPYC 7663Xeon Platinum 8592+
Socket
SP3
LGA4677
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
5600+75%
Max RAM Capacity
4096 GB
4096 GB
RAM Channels
8
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128+60%
80
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Platinum 8592+ supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 7663) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8592+). Primary use case: EPYC 7663 targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7663 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Xeon Platinum 8592+ rivals EPYC 9554.

FeatureEPYC 7663Xeon Platinum 8592+
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Server
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7663 was priced at $6366, while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ came in at $11600. On launch pricing ($6366 vs $11600), EPYC 7663 was $5234 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7663 delivers 12.9 pts/$ vs 7.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8592+ — making the EPYC 7663 the 56.2% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 7663Xeon Platinum 8592+
MSRP
$6366-45%
$11600
Performance per Dollar
12.9+79%
7.2
Release Date
2021
2023

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.