EPYC 7663 vs EPYC 9374F

EPYC 7663 vs EPYC 9374F Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7663

56 / 112

82,120

+0.1%

Ryzen 9 5950X

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

EPYC 9374F

32 / 64

82,009

0.0%

Ryzen 9 5950X

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7663 vs EPYC 9374F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7663 vs EPYC 9374F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7663

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 240W instead of 320W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9374F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.9 vs 16.9 PassMark/$ ($6,366 MSRP vs $4,850 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 9374F moves to SP5 and DDR5.

EPYC 9374F

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +40.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,516 less on MSRP ($4,850 MSRP vs $6,366 MSRP).
✅Delivers 31.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.9 vs 12.9 PassMark/$ ($4,850 MSRP vs $6,366 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (82,009 vs 82,120).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 320W vs 240W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9374F better than EPYC 7663?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 9374F is ahead with a 40.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7663 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7663 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 56 cores and 112 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9374F is the better buy right now. EPYC 9374F comes in $1,516 cheaper on MSRP at $4,850 MSRP versus $6,366 MSRP, and it still gives you a 40.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 7663 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.1% better PassMark. It is also 31.1% better value on MSRP (16.9 vs 12.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9374F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7663 vs EPYC 9374F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7663

The EPYC 7663 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 82,120 points. Launch price was $6,366.

EPYC 9374F

The EPYC 9374F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 82,009 points. Launch price was $4,850.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7663 packs 56 cores / 112 threads, while the EPYC 9374F offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7663 has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the EPYC 7663 versus 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9374F — a 20.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 9374F (base: 2 GHz vs 3.85 GHz). The EPYC 7663 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the EPYC 9374F uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7663 scores 82,120 against the EPYC 9374F's 82,009 — a 0.1% lead for the EPYC 7663. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	EPYC 7663	EPYC 9374F
Cores / Threads	56 / 112+75%	32 / 64
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	4.3 GHz+23%
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.85 GHz+93%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	256 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm+	5 nm, 6 nm-29%
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Genoa (2022−2023)
PassMark	82,120	82,009
Geekbench 6 Single	1,370	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	12,380	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7663 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9374F uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7663 versus 4800 on the EPYC 9374F — the EPYC 9374F supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9374F supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7663) vs 12 (EPYC 9374F). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7663) and SP5 (EPYC 9374F).

Feature	EPYC 7663	EPYC 9374F
Socket	SP3	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB	6144 GB+50%
RAM Channels	8	12+50%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 9374F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 7663) vs VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9374F). Primary use case: EPYC 7663 targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7663 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; EPYC 9374F rivals Xeon Platinum 8480+.

Feature	EPYC 7663	EPYC 9374F
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP
Target Use	Server	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7663 was priced at $6366, while the EPYC 9374F came in at $4850. On launch pricing ($6366 vs $4850), EPYC 9374F was $1516 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7663 delivers 12.9 pts/$ vs 16.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 9374F — making the EPYC 9374F the 26.9% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7663	EPYC 9374F
MSRP	$6366	$4850-24%
Performance per Dollar	12.9	16.9+31%
Release Date	2021	2022

Search EPYC 7663 on Amazon

Search EPYC 9374F on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.