EPYC 7663 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

AMD

EPYC 7663

56 Cores112 Thrd240 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2021
EPYC family
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

64 Cores128 Thrd280 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2020
Threadripper Pro family
··

EPYC 7663 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7663 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7663 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7663

2021

Why buy it

  • Draws 240W instead of 280W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower Geekbench multi-core (12,380 vs 20,256).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.9 vs 15.2 PassMark/$ ($6,366 MSRP vs $5,489 MSRP).

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

2020

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +14.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $877 less on MSRP ($5,489 MSRP vs $6,366 MSRP).
  • Delivers 17.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.2 vs 12.9 PassMark/$ ($5,489 MSRP vs $6,366 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 16.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 240W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX better than EPYC 7663?
Yes. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 14.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 63.6% better Geekbench multi-core, 1.4% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is the stronger fit. You are getting 63.6% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is the better buy right now. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX comes in $877 cheaper on MSRP at $5,489 MSRP versus $6,366 MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 17.6% better value on MSRP (15.2 vs 12.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 64 cores / 128 threads instead of 56/112. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 7663 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 7663

The EPYC 7663 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 82,120 points. Launch price was $6,366.

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 83,235 points. Launch price was $5,500.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7663 packs 56 cores / 112 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the EPYC 7663 versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX (base: 2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 7663 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7663 scores 82,120 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX's 83,235 — a 1.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,370 vs 1,266, a 7.9% lead for the EPYC 7663 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,380 vs 20,256 (48.3% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7663 vs 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX.

FeatureEPYC 7663Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Cores / Threads
56 / 112
64 / 128+14%
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz
4.2 GHz+20%
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.7 GHz+35%
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)
256 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
512K (per core)
Process
7 nm+
7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture
Milan (2021−2023)
Matisse (2019−2020)
PassMark
82,120
83,235+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi
64,355
Geekbench 6 Single
1,370+8%
1,266
Geekbench 6 Multi
12,380
20,256+64%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7663 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The EPYC 7663 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7663) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX).

FeatureEPYC 7663Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Socket
SP3
sWRX8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
4096 GB+100%
2048 GB
RAM Channels
8
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 7663) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX). Primary use case: EPYC 7663 targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7663 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX rivals Xeon Platinum 8280.

FeatureEPYC 7663Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
true
Target Use
Server
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7663 was priced at $6366, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX came in at $5489. On launch pricing ($6366 vs $5489), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX was $877 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7663 delivers 12.9 pts/$ vs 15.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX the 16.1% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 7663Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
MSRP
$6366
$5489-14%
Performance per Dollar
12.9
15.2+18%
Release Date
2021
2020

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.