EPYC 7713P
Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
EPYC 7713P vs Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7713P vs Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7713P vs Xeon Platinum 8568Y+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7713P
2021Why buy it
- ✅+2.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $1,487 less on MSRP ($5,010 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 32.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.3 vs 12.3 PassMark/$ ($5,010 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 350W, a 125W reduction.
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (79,683 vs 81,582).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.3 vs 16.3 PassMark/$ ($6,497 MSRP vs $5,010 MSRP).
- ❌55.6% higher power demand at 350W vs 225W.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 7713P better than Xeon Platinum 8568Y+?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7713P vs Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 7713P
The EPYC 7713P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.68 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 81,582 points. Launch price was $5,010.
Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
The Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 79,683 points. Launch price was $6,497.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7713P packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the EPYC 7713P has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.68 GHz on the EPYC 7713P versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ (base: 2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The EPYC 7713P uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7713P scores 81,582 against the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+'s 79,683 — a 2.4% lead for the EPYC 7713P. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7713P vs 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+.
| Feature | EPYC 7713P | Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+33% | 48 / 96 |
| Boost Clock | 3.68 GHz | 4 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.3 GHz+15% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 300 MB (total)+17% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm+-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 81,582+2% | 79,683 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,961 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 55,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7713P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7713P versus DDR5-5600 on the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ — the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7713P) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8568Y+) — the EPYC 7713P offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7713P) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8568Y+).
| Feature | EPYC 7713P | Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | DDR5-5600+75% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB | 4096 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV (EPYC 7713P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8568Y+). Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7713P rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ rivals EPYC 9554.
| Feature | EPYC 7713P | Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, SEV | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | High Performance Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7713P was priced at $5010, while the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ came in at $6497. On launch pricing ($5010 vs $6497), EPYC 7713P was $1487 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7713P delivers 16.3 pts/$ vs 12.3 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ — making the EPYC 7713P the 28.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7713P | Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5010-23% | $6497 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.3+33% | 12.3 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7713P and Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
