EPYC 7713P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7713P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7713P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7713P

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $479 less on MSRP ($5,010 MSRP vs $5,489 MSRP).
✅Draws 225W instead of 280W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (81,582 vs 83,235).

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌
9.6% HIGHER MSRP
$5,489 MSRPvs$5,010 MSRP
❌24.4% higher power demand at 280W vs 225W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX better than EPYC 7713P?

Yes. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 12.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is the stronger fit. You are getting 2% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7713P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX comes in 9.6% more expensive on MSRP at $5,489 MSRP versus $5,010 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7713P is also 7.4% better value on MSRP (16.3 vs 15.2 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 64 cores / 128 threads instead of 64/128. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 7713P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7713P

The EPYC 7713P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.68 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 81,582 points. Launch price was $5,010.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 83,235 points. Launch price was $5,500.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 7713P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX share an identical 64-core/128-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.68 GHz on the EPYC 7713P versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX — a 13.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX (base: 2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 7713P uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7713P scores 81,582 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX's 83,235 — a 2% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7713P vs 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX.

Feature	EPYC 7713P	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Cores / Threads	64 / 128	64 / 128
Boost Clock	3.68 GHz	4.2 GHz+14%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.7 GHz+35%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	256 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	7 nm+	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Matisse (2019−2020)
PassMark	81,582	83,235+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	64,355
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,266
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	20,256

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7713P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. The EPYC 7713P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7713P) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX).

Feature	EPYC 7713P	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Socket	SP3	sWRX8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB+100%	2048 GB
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV (EPYC 7713P) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX). Direct competitor: EPYC 7713P rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX rivals Xeon Platinum 8280.

Feature	EPYC 7713P	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, SEV	true

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7713P was priced at $5010, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX came in at $5489. On launch pricing ($5010 vs $5489), EPYC 7713P was $479 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7713P delivers 16.3 pts/$ vs 15.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX — making the EPYC 7713P the 7.1% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7713P	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
MSRP	$5010-9%	$5489
Performance per Dollar	16.3+7%	15.2
Release Date	2021	2020

Search EPYC 7713P on Amazon

Search Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.