EPYC 7713P vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7713P vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7713P vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7713P

2021

Why buy it

✅+2.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 225W instead of 280W, a 55W reduction.
✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.3 vs 20.0 PassMark/$ ($5,010 MSRP vs $3,990 MSRP).

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,020 less on MSRP ($3,990 MSRP vs $5,010 MSRP).
✅Delivers 23.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.0 vs 16.3 PassMark/$ ($3,990 MSRP vs $5,010 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (79,889 vs 81,582).
❌24.4% higher power demand at 280W vs 225W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7713P better than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is ahead with a 17.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7713P pulls ahead with 2.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7713P is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.1% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7713P is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 7713P comes in 25.6% more expensive on MSRP at $5,010 MSRP versus $3,990 MSRP, and it still gives you 2.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 17.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is also 23.0% better value on MSRP (20.0 vs 16.3 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7713P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019) and more multi-core headroom with 64 cores / 128 threads instead of 64/128. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 7713P vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7713P

The EPYC 7713P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.68 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 81,582 points. Launch price was $5,010.

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 79,889 points. Launch price was $3,999.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 7713P and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X share an identical 64-core/128-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.68 GHz on the EPYC 7713P versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X — a 15.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X (base: 2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The EPYC 7713P uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7713P scores 81,582 against the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X's 79,889 — a 2.1% lead for the EPYC 7713P. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7713P vs 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X.

Feature	EPYC 7713P	Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Cores / Threads	64 / 128	64 / 128
Boost Clock	3.68 GHz	4.3 GHz+17%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.9 GHz+45%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	256 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	7 nm+	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Matisse (2019−2020)
PassMark	81,582+2%	79,889
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	64,366
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,961
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	22,045

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7713P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. The EPYC 7713P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7713P) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7713P) vs 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X) — the EPYC 7713P offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7713P) and TRX40 (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X).

Feature	EPYC 7713P	Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Socket	SP3	TR4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB+1500%	256 GB
RAM Channels	8+100%	4
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+45%	88

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV (EPYC 7713P) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X). Direct competitor: EPYC 7713P rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Ryzen Threadripper 3990X rivals Core i9-10980XE.

Feature	EPYC 7713P	Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, SEV	true

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7713P was priced at $5010, while the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X came in at $3990. On launch pricing ($5010 vs $3990), Ryzen Threadripper 3990X was $1020 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7713P delivers 16.3 pts/$ vs 20.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X — making the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X the 20.6% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7713P	Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
MSRP	$5010	$3990-20%
Performance per Dollar	16.3	20.0+23%
Release Date	2021	2019

Search EPYC 7713P on Amazon

Search Ryzen Threadripper 3990X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.