EPYC 9255 vs Xeon 6737P

EPYC 9255 vs Xeon 6737P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9255

24 / 48

75,809

0.0%

Ryzen 7 8840HX

Ryzen 9 7900X3D

Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Xeon 6737P

32 / 64

79,634

+5.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9255 vs Xeon 6737P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9255 vs Xeon 6737P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9255

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,500 less on MSRP ($2,495 MSRP vs $4,995 MSRP).
✅Delivers 90.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.4 vs 15.9 PassMark/$ ($2,495 MSRP vs $4,995 MSRP).
✅Draws 200W instead of 270W, a 70W reduction.
✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (75,809 vs 79,634).

Xeon 6737P

2025

Why buy it

✅+5% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9255 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.9 vs 30.4 PassMark/$ ($4,995 MSRP vs $2,495 MSRP).
❌35% higher power demand at 270W vs 200W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9255 better than Xeon 6737P?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 9255 is ahead with a 17.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6737P pulls ahead with 5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6737P is the stronger fit. You are getting 5% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9255 is the better buy right now. EPYC 9255 comes in $2,500 cheaper on MSRP at $2,495 MSRP versus $4,995 MSRP, and it still gives you a 17.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon 6737P is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 5% better PassMark. It is also 90.6% better value on MSRP (30.4 vs 15.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6737P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024) and more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 24/48. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 9255 vs Xeon 6737P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9255

The EPYC 9255 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.25 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 75,809 points. Launch price was $2,495.

Xeon 6737P

The Xeon 6737P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 79,634 points. Launch price was $4,995.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9255 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon 6737P offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon 6737P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9255 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon 6737P — a 18.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 9255 (base: 3.25 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The EPYC 9255 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon 6737P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9255 scores 75,809 against the Xeon 6737P's 79,634 — a 4.9% lead for the Xeon 6737P. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9255 vs 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6737P.

Feature	EPYC 9255	Xeon 6737P
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	32 / 64+33%
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+20%	4 GHz
Base Clock	3.25 GHz+12%	2.9 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)	144 MB (total)+13%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	4 nm	Intel 3 nm-25%
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	75,809	79,634+5%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,000
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	45,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9255 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6737P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9255 versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6737P — the Xeon 6737P supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9255 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9255) vs 8 (Xeon 6737P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9255) vs 88 (Xeon 6737P) — the EPYC 9255 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9255) and C741 (Xeon 6737P).

Feature	EPYC 9255	Xeon 6737P
Socket	SP5	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	4800	DDR5-6400+33%
Max RAM Capacity	6144 GB+50%	4096 GB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+45%	88

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9255) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6737P). Primary use case: Xeon 6737P targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9255 rivals Xeon Platinum 8480+; Xeon 6737P rivals EPYC 9005.

Feature	EPYC 9255	Xeon 6737P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	High Performance Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9255 was priced at $2495, while the Xeon 6737P came in at $4995. On launch pricing ($2495 vs $4995), EPYC 9255 was $2500 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9255 delivers 30.4 pts/$ vs 15.9 pts/$ for the Xeon 6737P — making the EPYC 9255 the 62.3% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9255	Xeon 6737P
MSRP	$2495-50%	$4995
Performance per Dollar	30.4+91%	15.9
Release Date	2024	2025

Search EPYC 9255 on Amazon

Search Xeon 6737P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.