EPYC 9255
Xeon 6730P
EPYC 9255 vs Xeon 6730P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9255 vs Xeon 6730P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9255 vs Xeon 6730P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9255
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,231 less on MSRP ($2,495 MSRP vs $3,726 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 52.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.4 vs 19.9 PassMark/$ ($2,495 MSRP vs $3,726 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 250W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 288 MB).
Xeon 6730P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+125% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 128 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9255 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (74,113 vs 75,809).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.9 vs 30.4 PassMark/$ ($3,726 MSRP vs $2,495 MSRP).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 250W vs 200W.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9255 better than Xeon 6730P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9255 vs Xeon 6730P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9255
The EPYC 9255 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.25 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 75,809 points. Launch price was $2,495.
Xeon 6730P
The Xeon 6730P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 74,113 points. Launch price was $3,726.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9255 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon 6730P offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon 6730P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9255 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon 6730P — a 23.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9255 (base: 3.25 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 9255 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon 6730P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9255 scores 75,809 against the Xeon 6730P's 74,113 — a 2.3% lead for the EPYC 9255. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9255 vs 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6730P.
| Feature | EPYC 9255 | Xeon 6730P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 32 / 64+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+26% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.25 GHz+30% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 288 MB (total)+125% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm | Intel 3 nm-25% |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 75,809+2% | 74,113 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9255 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6730P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9255 versus 6400 on the Xeon 6730P — the Xeon 6730P supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9255 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9255) vs 8 (Xeon 6730P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9255) vs 80 (Xeon 6730P) — the EPYC 9255 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9255) and C741 (Xeon 6730P).
| Feature | EPYC 9255 | Xeon 6730P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | 6400+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144+50% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9255) vs VT-x, VT-d, TDX (Xeon 6730P). Direct competitor: EPYC 9255 rivals Xeon Platinum 8480+; Xeon 6730P rivals EPYC 9354.
| Feature | EPYC 9255 | Xeon 6730P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP | VT-x, VT-d, TDX |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9255 was priced at $2495, while the Xeon 6730P came in at $3726. On launch pricing ($2495 vs $3726), EPYC 9255 was $1231 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9255 delivers 30.4 pts/$ vs 19.9 pts/$ for the Xeon 6730P — making the EPYC 9255 the 41.7% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9255 | Xeon 6730P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2495-33% | $3726 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.4+53% | 19.9 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9255 and Xeon 6730P
