EPYC 7662
EPYC 9354
EPYC 7662 vs EPYC 9354 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7662 vs EPYC 9354 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7662 vs EPYC 9354: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7662
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 280W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9354 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (72,298 vs 73,892).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 21.6 PassMark/$ ($6,150 MSRP vs $3,420 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 9354 moves to SP5 and DDR5.
EPYC 9354
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,730 less on MSRP ($3,420 MSRP vs $6,150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 83.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.6 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($3,420 MSRP vs $6,150 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌24.4% higher power demand at 280W vs 225W.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9354 better than EPYC 7662?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7662 vs EPYC 9354 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 7662
The EPYC 7662 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2020-02-19. It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 32 MB. Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 72,298 points. Launch price was $6,700.
EPYC 9354
The EPYC 9354 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 73,892 points. Launch price was $3,420.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7662 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the EPYC 9354 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7662 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7662 versus 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 9354 — a 14.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 9354 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.25 GHz). The EPYC 7662 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the EPYC 9354 uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7662 scores 72,298 against the EPYC 9354's 73,892 — a 2.2% lead for the EPYC 9354. L3 cache: 256 MB on the EPYC 7662 vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9354.
| Feature | EPYC 7662 | EPYC 9354 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+100% | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.8 GHz+15% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 3.25 GHz+63% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB | 256 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+3100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 72,298 | 73,892+2% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7662 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9354 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7662 versus 4800 on the EPYC 9354 — the EPYC 9354 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9354 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7662) vs 12 (EPYC 9354). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7662) and SP5 (EPYC 9354).
| Feature | EPYC 7662 | EPYC 9354 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 6144+50% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 12+50% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 9354 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7662) vs VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9354). Direct competitor: EPYC 7662 rivals Xeon Platinum 8280; EPYC 9354 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.
| Feature | EPYC 7662 | EPYC 9354 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7662 was priced at $6150, while the EPYC 9354 came in at $3420. On launch pricing ($6150 vs $3420), EPYC 9354 was $2730 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7662 delivers 11.8 pts/$ vs 21.6 pts/$ for the EPYC 9354 — making the EPYC 9354 the 59.1% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7662 | EPYC 9354 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6150 | $3420-44% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.8 | 21.6+83% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7662 and EPYC 9354
