EPYC 7662
Xeon Platinum 8461V
EPYC 7662 vs Xeon Platinum 8461V Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7662 vs Xeon Platinum 8461V FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7662 vs Xeon Platinum 8461V: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7662
2020Why buy it
- ✅+162.6% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 98 MB).
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 300W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8461V across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (72,298 vs 74,982).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 16.7 PassMark/$ ($6,150 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8461V moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Platinum 8461V
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,659 less on MSRP ($4,491 MSRP vs $6,150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 42.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.7 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($4,491 MSRP vs $6,150 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (98 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 300W vs 225W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Platinum 8461V better than EPYC 7662?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7662 vs Xeon Platinum 8461V Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 7662
The EPYC 7662 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2020-02-19. It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 32 MB. Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 72,298 points. Launch price was $6,700.
Xeon Platinum 8461V
The Xeon Platinum 8461V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 97.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 74,982 points. Launch price was $4,491.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7662 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8461V offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the EPYC 7662 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7662 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8461V — a 11.4% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8461V (base: 2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 7662 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8461V uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7662 scores 72,298 against the Xeon Platinum 8461V's 74,982 — a 3.6% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8461V. L3 cache: 256 MB on the EPYC 7662 vs 97.5 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8461V.
| Feature | EPYC 7662 | Xeon Platinum 8461V |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+33% | 48 / 96 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.7 GHz+12% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz+10% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB+163% | 97.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 72,298 | 74,982+4% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7662 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8461V uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7662 versus 4800 on the Xeon Platinum 8461V — the Xeon Platinum 8461V supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7662) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8461V) — the EPYC 7662 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7662) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8461V).
| Feature | EPYC 7662 | Xeon Platinum 8461V |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Platinum 8461V supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7662 rivals Xeon Platinum 8280; Xeon Platinum 8461V rivals EPYC 9454.
| Feature | EPYC 7662 | Xeon Platinum 8461V |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7662 was priced at $6150, while the Xeon Platinum 8461V came in at $4491. On launch pricing ($6150 vs $4491), Xeon Platinum 8461V was $1659 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7662 delivers 11.8 pts/$ vs 16.7 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8461V — making the Xeon Platinum 8461V the 34.7% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7662 | Xeon Platinum 8461V |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6150 | $4491-27% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.8 | 16.7+42% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7662 and Xeon Platinum 8461V
