EPYC 7662 vs EPYC 9274F

EPYC 7662 vs EPYC 9274F Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7662

64 / 128

72,298

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 7900

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

EPYC 9274F

24 / 48

73,982

+2.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7662 vs EPYC 9274F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7662 vs EPYC 9274F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7662

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 225W instead of 320W, a 95W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9274F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (72,298 vs 73,982).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 24.2 PassMark/$ ($6,150 MSRP vs $3,060 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 9274F moves to SP5 and DDR5.

EPYC 9274F

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +43.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $3,090 less on MSRP ($3,060 MSRP vs $6,150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 105.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.2 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($3,060 MSRP vs $6,150 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌42.2% higher power demand at 320W vs 225W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9274F better than EPYC 7662?

Yes. EPYC 9274F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 43.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9274F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 43.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9274F is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.3% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9274F is the better buy right now. EPYC 9274F comes in $3,090 cheaper on MSRP at $3,060 MSRP versus $6,150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 43.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 105.7% better value on MSRP (24.2 vs 11.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9274F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2020), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of SP3, more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 64/128, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7662 vs EPYC 9274F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7662

The EPYC 7662 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2020-02-19. It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 32 MB. Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 72,298 points. Launch price was $6,700.

EPYC 9274F

The EPYC 9274F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.05 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 73,982 points. Launch price was $3,060.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7662 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the EPYC 9274F offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7662 has 40 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7662 versus 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9274F — a 26.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9274F (base: 2 GHz vs 4.05 GHz). The EPYC 7662 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the EPYC 9274F uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7662 scores 72,298 against the EPYC 9274F's 73,982 — a 2.3% lead for the EPYC 9274F. L3 cache: 256 MB on the EPYC 7662 vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9274F.

Feature	EPYC 7662	EPYC 9274F
Cores / Threads	64 / 128+167%	24 / 48
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	4.3 GHz+30%
Base Clock	2 GHz	4.05 GHz+102%
L3 Cache	256 MB	256 MB (total)
L2 Cache	32 MB+3100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	5 nm, 6 nm-29%
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Genoa (2022−2023)
PassMark	72,298	73,982+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7662 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9274F uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7662 versus 4800 on the EPYC 9274F — the EPYC 9274F supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9274F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7662) vs 12 (EPYC 9274F). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7662) and SP5 (EPYC 9274F).

Feature	EPYC 7662	EPYC 9274F
Socket	SP3	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200	4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4096	6144+50%
RAM Channels	8	12+50%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 9274F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7662) vs VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9274F). Direct competitor: EPYC 7662 rivals Xeon Platinum 8280; EPYC 9274F rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.

Feature	EPYC 7662	EPYC 9274F
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7662 was priced at $6150, while the EPYC 9274F came in at $3060. On launch pricing ($6150 vs $3060), EPYC 9274F was $3090 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7662 delivers 11.8 pts/$ vs 24.2 pts/$ for the EPYC 9274F — making the EPYC 9274F the 69.1% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7662	EPYC 9274F
MSRP	$6150	$3060-50%
Performance per Dollar	11.8	24.2+105%
Release Date	2020	2022

Search EPYC 7662 on Amazon

Search EPYC 9274F on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.