EPYC 7662 vs Xeon 6740E

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7662

64 Cores128 Thrd225 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2020

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon 6740E

96 Cores96 Thrd250 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2024

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7662 vs Xeon 6740E Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7662

64 / 128

72,298

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 7900

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon 6740E

96 / 96

76,167

+5.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7662 vs Xeon 6740E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7662 vs Xeon 6740E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7662

2020

Why buy it

✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 96 MB).
✅Draws 225W instead of 250W, a 25W reduction.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6740E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (72,298 vs 76,167).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 14.5 PassMark/$ ($6,150 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon 6740E moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.

Xeon 6740E

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $885 less on MSRP ($5,265 MSRP vs $6,150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 23.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.5 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($5,265 MSRP vs $6,150 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (96 MB vs 256 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6740E better than EPYC 7662?

Yes. Xeon 6740E is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 5.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon 6740E is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6740E is the stronger fit. You are getting 5.4% better PassMark, backed by 96 cores and 96 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6740E is the better buy right now. Xeon 6740E comes in $885 cheaper on MSRP at $5,265 MSRP versus $6,150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 23.1% better value on MSRP (14.5 vs 11.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6740E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA4710 and DDR5 instead of SP3, more multi-core headroom with 96 cores / 96 threads instead of 64/128, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7662 vs Xeon 6740E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7662

The EPYC 7662 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2020-02-19. It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 32 MB. Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 72,298 points. Launch price was $6,700.

Xeon 6740E

The Xeon 6740E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture. It features 96 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB (per module). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 76,167 points. Launch price was $5,265.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7662 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon 6740E offers 96 cores / 96 threads — the Xeon 6740E has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7662 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon 6740E — a 3.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 7662 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 7662 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon 6740E uses Sierra Forest (2024) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7662 scores 72,298 against the Xeon 6740E's 76,167 — a 5.2% lead for the Xeon 6740E. L3 cache: 256 MB on the EPYC 7662 vs 96 MB (total) on the Xeon 6740E.

Feature	EPYC 7662	Xeon 6740E
Cores / Threads	64 / 128	96 / 96+50%
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+3%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.4 GHz+20%
L3 Cache	256 MB+167%	96 MB (total)
L2 Cache	32 MB+700%	4 MB (per module)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	Intel 3 nm-57%
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Sierra Forest (2024)
PassMark	72,298	76,167+5%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7662 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6740E uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7662 versus 6400 on the Xeon 6740E — the Xeon 6740E supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7662) vs 80 (Xeon 6740E) — the EPYC 7662 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7662) and C741 (Xeon 6740E).

Feature	EPYC 7662	Xeon 6740E
Socket	SP3	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	6400+100%
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon 6740E supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7662) vs VT-x, VT-d, TDX (Xeon 6740E). Direct competitor: EPYC 7662 rivals Xeon Platinum 8280; Xeon 6740E rivals EPYC 9005.

Feature	EPYC 7662	Xeon 6740E
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, TDX

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7662 was priced at $6150, while the Xeon 6740E came in at $5265. On launch pricing ($6150 vs $5265), Xeon 6740E was $885 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7662 delivers 11.8 pts/$ vs 14.5 pts/$ for the Xeon 6740E — making the Xeon 6740E the 20.7% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7662	Xeon 6740E
MSRP	$6150	$5265-14%
Performance per Dollar	11.8	14.5+23%
Release Date	2020	2024

Search EPYC 7662 on Amazon

Search Xeon 6740E on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.