EPYC 7662 vs Xeon Gold 6448H

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7662

64 Cores128 Thrd225 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2020

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Gold 6448H

32 Cores64 Thrd250 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2023

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7662 vs Xeon Gold 6448H Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7662

64 / 128

72,298

+2.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 7900

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon Gold 6448H

32 / 64

70,292

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7662 vs Xeon Gold 6448H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7662 vs Xeon Gold 6448H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7662

2020

Why buy it

✅+2.9% higher PassMark.
✅+326.7% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 60 MB).
✅Draws 225W instead of 250W, a 25W reduction.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6448H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 19.2 PassMark/$ ($6,150 MSRP vs $3,658 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6448H moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon Gold 6448H

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +20.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,492 less on MSRP ($3,658 MSRP vs $6,150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 63.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.2 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($3,658 MSRP vs $6,150 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (70,292 vs 72,298).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (60 MB vs 256 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6448H better than EPYC 7662?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Gold 6448H is ahead with a 20.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7662 pulls ahead with 2.9% better PassMark. EPYC 7662 also has the bigger cache pool with 326.7% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 60 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7662 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.9% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 326.7% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 60 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6448H is the better buy right now. Xeon Gold 6448H comes in $2,492 cheaper on MSRP at $3,658 MSRP versus $6,150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 20.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 7662 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 2.9% better PassMark. It is also 63.5% better value on MSRP (19.2 vs 11.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6448H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7662 vs Xeon Gold 6448H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7662

The EPYC 7662 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2020-02-19. It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 32 MB. Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 72,298 points. Launch price was $6,700.

Xeon Gold 6448H

The Xeon Gold 6448H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 70,292 points. Launch price was $3,658.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7662 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6448H offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7662 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7662 versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6448H — a 21.6% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6448H (base: 2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 7662 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6448H uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7662 scores 72,298 against the Xeon Gold 6448H's 70,292 — a 2.8% lead for the EPYC 7662. L3 cache: 256 MB on the EPYC 7662 vs 60 MB on the Xeon Gold 6448H.

Feature	EPYC 7662	Xeon Gold 6448H
Cores / Threads	64 / 128+100%	32 / 64
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	4.1 GHz+24%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.4 GHz+20%
L3 Cache	256 MB+327%	60 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+1500%	2 MB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	72,298+3%	70,292

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7662 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6448H uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7662 versus 4800 on the Xeon Gold 6448H — the Xeon Gold 6448H supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7662) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6448H) — the EPYC 7662 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7662) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6448H).

Feature	EPYC 7662	Xeon Gold 6448H
Socket	SP3	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200	4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 6448H supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7662 rivals Xeon Platinum 8280; Xeon Gold 6448H rivals EPYC 9454.

Feature	EPYC 7662	Xeon Gold 6448H
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7662 was priced at $6150, while the Xeon Gold 6448H came in at $3658. On launch pricing ($6150 vs $3658), Xeon Gold 6448H was $2492 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7662 delivers 11.8 pts/$ vs 19.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6448H — making the Xeon Gold 6448H the 48.2% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7662	Xeon Gold 6448H
MSRP	$6150	$3658-41%
Performance per Dollar	11.8	19.2+63%
Release Date	2020	2023

Search EPYC 7662 on Amazon

Search Xeon Gold 6448H on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.