EPYC 4585PX vs EPYC 7662

AMD

EPYC 4585PX

16 Cores32 Thrd170 WWMax: 5.7 GHz2025
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

EPYC 7662

64 Cores128 Thrd225 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2020
EPYC family
·······

EPYC 4585PX vs EPYC 7662 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4585PX vs EPYC 7662 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4585PX vs EPYC 7662: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4585PX

2025

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +39.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $5,451 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $6,150 MSRP).
  • Delivers 758.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 100.9 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $6,150 MSRP).
  • Draws 170W instead of 225W, a 55W reduction.
  • Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (70,563 vs 72,298).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).

EPYC 7662

2020

Why buy it

  • +2.5% higher PassMark.
  • +100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
  • 357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4585PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 100.9 PassMark/$ ($6,150 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
  • 32.4% higher power demand at 225W vs 170W.
  • Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 4585PX moves to AM5 and DDR5.
  • No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4585PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4585PX better than EPYC 7662?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 4585PX is ahead with a 39.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7662 pulls ahead with 2.5% better PassMark. EPYC 7662 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7662 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.5% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 4585PX is the better buy right now. EPYC 4585PX comes in $5,451 cheaper on MSRP at $699 MSRP versus $6,150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 39.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 7662 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 2.5% better PassMark. It is also 758.7% better value on MSRP (100.9 vs 11.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4585PX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2020), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 4585PX vs EPYC 7662 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 4585PX

The EPYC 4585PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 70,563 points. Launch price was $699.

AMD

EPYC 7662

The EPYC 7662 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2020-02-19. It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 32 MB. Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 72,298 points. Launch price was $6,700.

Processing Power

The EPYC 4585PX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 7662 offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 7662 has 48 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4585PX versus 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7662 — a 53.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 4585PX (base: 4.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 4585PX uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 7662 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4585PX scores 70,563 against the EPYC 7662's 72,298 — a 2.4% lead for the EPYC 7662. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4585PX vs 256 MB on the EPYC 7662.

FeatureEPYC 4585PXEPYC 7662
Cores / Threads
16 / 32
64 / 128+300%
Boost Clock
5.7 GHz+73%
3.3 GHz
Base Clock
4.3 GHz+115%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
128 MB (total)
256 MB+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
32 MB+3100%
Process
4 nm-43%
7 nm, 14 nm
Architecture
Grado (2025)
Zen 2 (2017−2020)
PassMark
70,563
72,298+2%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4585PX uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7662 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the EPYC 4585PX versus 3200 on the EPYC 7662 — the EPYC 4585PX supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7662 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 256 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4585PX) vs 8 (EPYC 7662). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4585PX) vs 128 (EPYC 7662) — the EPYC 7662 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4585PX) and SP3 (EPYC 7662).

FeatureEPYC 4585PXEPYC 7662
Socket
AM5
SP3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
5600+75%
3200
Max RAM Capacity
256
4096+1500%
RAM Channels
2
8+300%
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
28
128+357%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the EPYC 4585PX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 4585PX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4585PX) vs VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7662). The EPYC 4585PX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the EPYC 7662 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4585PX rivals Core Ultra 9 285K; EPYC 7662 rivals Xeon Platinum 8280.

FeatureEPYC 4585PXEPYC 7662
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
AMD Radeon Graphics
None
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 4585PX was priced at $699, while the EPYC 7662 came in at $6150. On launch pricing ($699 vs $6150), EPYC 4585PX was $5451 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4585PX delivers 100.9 pts/$ vs 11.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 7662 — making the EPYC 4585PX the 158.3% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 4585PXEPYC 7662
MSRP
$699-89%
$6150
Performance per Dollar
100.9+755%
11.8
Release Date
2025
2020

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.