EPYC 7H12
EPYC 4585PX
EPYC 7H12 vs EPYC 4585PX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7H12 vs EPYC 4585PX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7H12 vs EPYC 4585PX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7H12
2019Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4585PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (69,633 vs 70,563).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 100.9 PassMark/$ ($6,950 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ❌64.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 170W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while EPYC 4585PX moves to AM5 and DDR5.
EPYC 4585PX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $6,251 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $6,950 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 907.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 100.9 vs 10.0 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $6,950 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 280W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4585PX better than EPYC 7H12?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7H12 vs EPYC 4585PX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 7H12
The EPYC 7H12 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2019-09-18. It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 69,633 points. Launch price was $6,950.
EPYC 4585PX
The EPYC 4585PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 70,563 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7H12 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the EPYC 4585PX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7H12 has 48 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7H12 versus 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4585PX — a 53.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 4585PX (base: 2.6 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The EPYC 7H12 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the EPYC 4585PX uses Grado (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7H12 scores 69,633 against the EPYC 4585PX's 70,563 — a 1.3% lead for the EPYC 4585PX. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7H12 vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4585PX.
| Feature | EPYC 7H12 | EPYC 4585PX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+300% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 5.7 GHz+73% |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 4.3 GHz+65% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+100% | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+51100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Grado (2025) |
| PassMark | 69,633 | 70,563+1% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7H12 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 4585PX uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7H12 versus 5600 on the EPYC 4585PX — the EPYC 4585PX supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7H12 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 256 — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7H12) vs 2 (EPYC 4585PX). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7H12) vs 28 (EPYC 4585PX) — the EPYC 7H12 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7H12) and AM5 (EPYC 4585PX).
| Feature | EPYC 7H12 | EPYC 4585PX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 5600+75% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096+1500% | 256 |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+357% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Only the EPYC 4585PX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 4585PX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7H12) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4585PX). The EPYC 4585PX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the EPYC 7H12 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 7H12 rivals Xeon Platinum 8280; EPYC 4585PX rivals Core Ultra 9 285K.
| Feature | EPYC 7H12 | EPYC 4585PX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | AMD Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7H12 was priced at $6950, while the EPYC 4585PX came in at $699. On launch pricing ($6950 vs $699), EPYC 4585PX was $6251 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7H12 delivers 10.0 pts/$ vs 100.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 4585PX — making the EPYC 4585PX the 163.9% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7H12 | EPYC 4585PX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6950 | $699-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.0 | 100.9+909% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7H12 and EPYC 4585PX
