EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7573X
EPYC 7H12 vs EPYC 7573X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7H12 vs EPYC 7573X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7H12 vs EPYC 7573X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7H12
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7573X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 768 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($6,950 MSRP vs $5,590 MSRP).
EPYC 7573X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,360 less on MSRP ($5,590 MSRP vs $6,950 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 24.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.4 vs 10.0 PassMark/$ ($5,590 MSRP vs $6,950 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (69,432 vs 69,633).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 7573X better than EPYC 7H12?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7H12 vs EPYC 7573X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 7H12
The EPYC 7H12 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2019-09-18. It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 69,633 points. Launch price was $6,950.
EPYC 7573X
The EPYC 7573X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-01. It is based on the Milan-X (2022) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 69,432 points. Launch price was $5,590.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7H12 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the EPYC 7573X offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7H12 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7H12 versus 3.6 GHz on the EPYC 7573X — a 8.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 7573X (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The EPYC 7H12 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the EPYC 7573X uses Milan-X (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7H12 scores 69,633 against the EPYC 7573X's 69,432 — a 0.3% lead for the EPYC 7H12. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7H12 vs 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 7573X.
| Feature | EPYC 7H12 | EPYC 7573X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+100% | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.6 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 2.8 GHz+8% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 768 MB (total)+200% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Milan-X (2022) |
| PassMark | 69,633 | 69,432 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7H12 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7573X uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7H12) and SP3 (EPYC 7573X).
| Feature | EPYC 7H12 | EPYC 7573X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7H12 rivals Xeon Platinum 8280; EPYC 7573X rivals Xeon Platinum 8280.
| Feature | EPYC 7H12 | EPYC 7573X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7H12 was priced at $6950, while the EPYC 7573X came in at $5590. On launch pricing ($6950 vs $5590), EPYC 7573X was $1360 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7H12 delivers 10.0 pts/$ vs 12.4 pts/$ for the EPYC 7573X — making the EPYC 7573X the 21.4% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7H12 | EPYC 7573X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6950 | $5590-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.0 | 12.4+24% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7H12 and EPYC 7573X
