EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7662
EPYC 7H12 vs EPYC 7662 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7H12 vs EPYC 7662 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7H12 vs EPYC 7662: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7H12
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (69,633 vs 72,298).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($6,950 MSRP vs $6,150 MSRP).
- ❌24.4% higher power demand at 280W vs 225W.
EPYC 7662
2020Why buy it
- ✅+3.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $800 less on MSRP ($6,150 MSRP vs $6,950 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 17.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 11.8 vs 10.0 PassMark/$ ($6,150 MSRP vs $6,950 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 280W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7H12 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 7662 better than EPYC 7H12?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7H12 vs EPYC 7662 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 7H12
The EPYC 7H12 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2019-09-18. It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 69,633 points. Launch price was $6,950.
EPYC 7662
The EPYC 7662 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2020-02-19. It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 32 MB. Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 72,298 points. Launch price was $6,700.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 7H12 and EPYC 7662 share an identical 64-core/128-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7H12 versus 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7662 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). Both are built on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture using a 7 nm, 14 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 7H12 scores 69,633 against the EPYC 7662's 72,298 — a 3.8% lead for the EPYC 7662. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7H12 vs 256 MB on the EPYC 7662.
| Feature | EPYC 7H12 | EPYC 7662 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128 | 64 / 128 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz+30% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 256 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+1500% | 32 MB |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 69,633 | 72,298+4% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7H12 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7662 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7H12) and SP3 (EPYC 7662).
| Feature | EPYC 7H12 | EPYC 7662 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7H12 rivals Xeon Platinum 8280; EPYC 7662 rivals Xeon Platinum 8280.
| Feature | EPYC 7H12 | EPYC 7662 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7H12 was priced at $6950, while the EPYC 7662 came in at $6150. On launch pricing ($6950 vs $6150), EPYC 7662 was $800 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7H12 delivers 10.0 pts/$ vs 11.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 7662 — making the EPYC 7662 the 16% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7H12 | EPYC 7662 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6950 | $6150-12% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.0 | 11.8+18% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7H12 and EPYC 7662
