EPYC 7H12 vs EPYC 9274F
EPYC 7H12
EPYC 9274F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7H12
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9274F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 7H12 | EPYC 9274F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($1,340) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,490) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 7H12 | EPYC 9274F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+75%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($1,340) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,490) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7H12 and EPYC 9274F
EPYC 7H12
The EPYC 7H12 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2019-09-18. It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 69,633 points. Launch price was $6,950.
EPYC 9274F
The EPYC 9274F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.05 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 73,982 points. Launch price was $3,060.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7H12 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the EPYC 9274F offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7H12 has 40 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7H12 versus 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9274F — a 26.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9274F (base: 2.6 GHz vs 4.05 GHz). The EPYC 7H12 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the EPYC 9274F uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7H12 scores 69,633 against the EPYC 9274F's 73,982 — a 6.1% lead for the EPYC 9274F. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 7H12 | EPYC 9274F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+167% | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 4.3 GHz+30% |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 4.05 GHz+56% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 256 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 69,633 | 73,982+6% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7H12 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9274F uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7H12 versus 4800 on the EPYC 9274F — the EPYC 9274F supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9274F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7H12) vs 12 (EPYC 9274F). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7H12) and SP5 (EPYC 9274F).
| Feature | EPYC 7H12 | EPYC 9274F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 6144+50% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 12+50% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 9274F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7H12) vs VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9274F). Direct competitor: EPYC 7H12 rivals Xeon Platinum 8280; EPYC 9274F rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.
| Feature | EPYC 7H12 | EPYC 9274F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7H12 launched at $6950 MSRP, while the EPYC 9274F debuted at $3060. At current prices ($1340 vs $2490), the EPYC 7H12 is $1150 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7H12 delivers 52.0 pts/$ vs 29.7 pts/$ for the EPYC 9274F — making the EPYC 7H12 the 54.5% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7H12 | EPYC 9274F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6950 | $3060-56% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1340-46% | $2490 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.0+75% | 29.7 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7H12 and EPYC 9274F
