EPYC 4585PX vs Xeon Platinum 8461V

CPU

GPU

EPYC 4585PX

16 Cores32 Thrd170 WWMax: 5.7 GHz2025

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Platinum 8461V

48 Cores96 Thrd300 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2023

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 4585PX vs Xeon Platinum 8461V Performance Spectrum

EPYC 4585PX

16 / 32

70,563

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon Platinum 8461V

48 / 96

74,982

+6.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4585PX vs Xeon Platinum 8461V FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4585PX vs Xeon Platinum 8461V: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4585PX

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +25.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+31.3% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 98 MB).
✅Costs $3,792 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
✅Delivers 504.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 100.9 vs 16.7 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
✅Draws 170W instead of 300W, a 130W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (70,563 vs 74,982).

Xeon Platinum 8461V

2023

Why buy it

✅+6.3% higher PassMark.
✅185.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4585PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (98 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.7 vs 100.9 PassMark/$ ($4,491 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
❌76.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 170W.
❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4585PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4585PX better than Xeon Platinum 8461V?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 4585PX is ahead with a 25.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8461V pulls ahead with 6.3% better PassMark. EPYC 4585PX also has the bigger cache pool with 31.3% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 98 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8461V is the stronger fit. You are getting 6.3% better PassMark, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4585PX is the better buy right now. EPYC 4585PX comes in $3,792 cheaper on MSRP at $699 MSRP versus $4,491 MSRP, and it still gives you a 25.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Platinum 8461V is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 6.3% better PassMark. It is also 504.6% better value on MSRP (100.9 vs 16.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4585PX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023) and 31.3% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 98 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 4585PX vs Xeon Platinum 8461V Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4585PX

The EPYC 4585PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 70,563 points. Launch price was $699.

Xeon Platinum 8461V

The Xeon Platinum 8461V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 97.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 74,982 points. Launch price was $4,491.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 4585PX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8461V offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8461V has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4585PX versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8461V — a 42.6% clock advantage for the EPYC 4585PX (base: 4.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 4585PX uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8461V uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4585PX scores 70,563 against the Xeon Platinum 8461V's 74,982 — a 6.1% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8461V. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4585PX vs 97.5 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8461V.

Feature	EPYC 4585PX	Xeon Platinum 8461V
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	48 / 96+200%
Boost Clock	5.7 GHz+54%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	4.3 GHz+95%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+31%	97.5 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	4 nm-43%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Grado (2025)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	70,563	74,982+6%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4585PX uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8461V uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the EPYC 4585PX versus 4800 on the Xeon Platinum 8461V — the EPYC 4585PX supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8461V supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 256 — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4585PX) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8461V). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4585PX) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8461V) — the Xeon Platinum 8461V offers 52 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4585PX) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8461V).

Feature	EPYC 4585PX	Xeon Platinum 8461V
Socket	AM5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	5600+17%	4800
Max RAM Capacity	256	4096+1500%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	80+186%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the EPYC 4585PX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4585PX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8461V). The EPYC 4585PX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon Platinum 8461V requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4585PX rivals Core Ultra 9 285K; Xeon Platinum 8461V rivals EPYC 9454.

Feature	EPYC 4585PX	Xeon Platinum 8461V
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon Graphics	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 4585PX was priced at $699, while the Xeon Platinum 8461V came in at $4491. On launch pricing ($699 vs $4491), EPYC 4585PX was $3792 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4585PX delivers 100.9 pts/$ vs 16.7 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8461V — making the EPYC 4585PX the 143.2% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 4585PX	Xeon Platinum 8461V
MSRP	$699-84%	$4491
Performance per Dollar	100.9+504%	16.7
Release Date	2025	2023

Search EPYC 4585PX on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8461V on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.