EPYC 4585PX
EPYC 9384X
EPYC 4585PX vs EPYC 9384X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4585PX vs EPYC 9384X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4585PX vs EPYC 9384X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4585PX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,830 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 673.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 100.9 vs 13.0 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 320W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while EPYC 9384X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (70,563 vs 72,121).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 768 MB).
EPYC 9384X
2023Why buy it
- ✅+2.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+500% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4585PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.0 vs 100.9 PassMark/$ ($5,529 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ❌88.2% higher power demand at 320W vs 170W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4585PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4585PX better than EPYC 9384X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4585PX vs EPYC 9384X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 4585PX
The EPYC 4585PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 70,563 points. Launch price was $699.
EPYC 9384X
The EPYC 9384X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Genoa-X (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 72,121 points. Launch price was $5,529.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4585PX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 9384X offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 9384X has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4585PX versus 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 9384X — a 37.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 4585PX (base: 4.3 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The EPYC 4585PX uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 9384X uses Genoa-X (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4585PX scores 70,563 against the EPYC 9384X's 72,121 — a 2.2% lead for the EPYC 9384X. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4585PX vs 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 9384X.
| Feature | EPYC 4585PX | EPYC 9384X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 32 / 64+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+46% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.3 GHz+39% | 3.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 768 MB (total)+500% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-20% | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Grado (2025) | Genoa-X (2023) |
| PassMark | 70,563 | 72,121+2% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4585PX uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9384X uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the EPYC 4585PX versus 4800 on the EPYC 9384X — the EPYC 4585PX supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9384X supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 256 — 2300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4585PX) vs 12 (EPYC 9384X). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4585PX) vs 128 (EPYC 9384X) — the EPYC 9384X offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4585PX) and SP5 (EPYC 9384X).
| Feature | EPYC 4585PX | EPYC 9384X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+17% | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 | 6144+2300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 12+500% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 128+357% |
Advanced Features
Only the EPYC 4585PX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4585PX) vs VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9384X). The EPYC 4585PX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the EPYC 9384X requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4585PX rivals Core Ultra 9 285K; EPYC 9384X rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.
| Feature | EPYC 4585PX | EPYC 9384X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 4585PX was priced at $699, while the EPYC 9384X came in at $5529. On launch pricing ($699 vs $5529), EPYC 4585PX was $4830 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4585PX delivers 100.9 pts/$ vs 13.0 pts/$ for the EPYC 9384X — making the EPYC 4585PX the 154.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4585PX | EPYC 9384X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699-87% | $5529 |
| Performance per Dollar | 100.9+676% | 13.0 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 4585PX and EPYC 9384X
