EPYC 4585PX vs Xeon w7-3565X

CPU

GPU

EPYC 4585PX

16 Cores32 Thrd170 WWMax: 5.7 GHz2025

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon w7-3565X

32 Cores64 Thrd335 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 4585PX vs Xeon w7-3565X Performance Spectrum

EPYC 4585PX

16 / 32

70,563

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon w7-3565X

32 / 64

70,982

+0.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4585PX vs Xeon w7-3565X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4585PX vs Xeon w7-3565X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4585PX

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,990 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $2,689 MSRP).
✅Delivers 282.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 100.9 vs 26.4 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $2,689 MSRP).
✅Draws 170W instead of 335W, a 165W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Xeon w7-3565X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (70,563 vs 70,982).

Xeon w7-3565X

2024

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4585PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 26.4 vs 100.9 PassMark/$ ($2,689 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
❌97.1% higher power demand at 335W vs 170W.
❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4585PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4585PX better than Xeon w7-3565X?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 4585PX is ahead with a 6.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w7-3565X pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark. EPYC 4585PX also has the bigger cache pool with 55.2% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 83 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w7-3565X is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4585PX is the better buy right now. EPYC 4585PX comes in $1,990 cheaper on MSRP at $699 MSRP versus $2,689 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon w7-3565X is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.6% better PassMark. It is also 282.4% better value on MSRP (100.9 vs 26.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4585PX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024) and 3D V-Cache and a much larger 128 MB L3 cache instead of 83 MB. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 4585PX vs Xeon w7-3565X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4585PX

The EPYC 4585PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 70,563 points. Launch price was $699.

Xeon w7-3565X

The Xeon w7-3565X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 82.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 335 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 70,982 points. Launch price was $2,689.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 4585PX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon w7-3565X offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon w7-3565X has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4585PX versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3565X — a 17.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 4585PX (base: 4.3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 4585PX uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon w7-3565X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4585PX scores 70,563 against the Xeon w7-3565X's 70,982 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon w7-3565X. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4585PX vs 82.5 MB on the Xeon w7-3565X.

Feature	EPYC 4585PX	Xeon w7-3565X
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	32 / 64+100%
Boost Clock	5.7 GHz+19%	4.8 GHz
Base Clock	4.3 GHz+72%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+55%	82.5 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	4 nm-43%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Grado (2025)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	70,563	70,982
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,300
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	19,812

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4585PX uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w7-3565X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the EPYC 4585PX versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w7-3565X — the EPYC 4585PX supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w7-3565X supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4585PX) vs 8 (Xeon w7-3565X). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4585PX) vs 112 (Xeon w7-3565X) — the Xeon w7-3565X offers 84 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4585PX) and W790 (Xeon w7-3565X).

Feature	EPYC 4585PX	Xeon w7-3565X
Socket	AM5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	5600+17%	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	4096 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	112+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4585PX) vs true (Xeon w7-3565X). The EPYC 4585PX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon w7-3565X requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4585PX rivals Core Ultra 9 285K; Xeon w7-3565X rivals Ryzen Threadripper 7970X.

Feature	EPYC 4585PX	Xeon w7-3565X
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon Graphics	None
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	true

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 4585PX was priced at $699, while the Xeon w7-3565X came in at $2689. On launch pricing ($699 vs $2689), EPYC 4585PX was $1990 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4585PX delivers 100.9 pts/$ vs 26.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-3565X — making the EPYC 4585PX the 117.1% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 4585PX	Xeon w7-3565X
MSRP	$699-74%	$2689
Performance per Dollar	100.9+282%	26.4
Release Date	2025	2024

Search EPYC 4585PX on Amazon

Search Xeon w7-3565X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.