EPYC 7662 vs Xeon Gold 6548Y+

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7662

64 Cores128 Thrd225 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2020

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Gold 6548Y+

32 Cores64 Thrd250 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2023

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7662 vs Xeon Gold 6548Y+ Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7662

64 / 128

72,298

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 7900

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon Gold 6548Y+

32 / 64

73,387

+1.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7662 vs Xeon Gold 6548Y+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7662 vs Xeon Gold 6548Y+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7662

2020

Why buy it

✅+326.7% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 60 MB).
✅Draws 225W instead of 250W, a 25W reduction.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6548Y+ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (72,298 vs 73,387).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 19.7 PassMark/$ ($6,150 MSRP vs $3,726 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6548Y+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon Gold 6548Y+

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,424 less on MSRP ($3,726 MSRP vs $6,150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 67.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.7 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($3,726 MSRP vs $6,150 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (60 MB vs 256 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6548Y+ better than EPYC 7662?

Yes. Xeon Gold 6548Y+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 6548Y+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6548Y+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6548Y+ is the better buy right now. Xeon Gold 6548Y+ comes in $2,424 cheaper on MSRP at $3,726 MSRP versus $6,150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 67.5% better value on MSRP (19.7 vs 11.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6548Y+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of SP3, more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 64/128, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7662 vs Xeon Gold 6548Y+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7662

The EPYC 7662 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2020-02-19. It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 32 MB. Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 72,298 points. Launch price was $6,700.

Xeon Gold 6548Y+

The Xeon Gold 6548Y+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 73,387 points. Launch price was $3,726.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7662 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7662 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7662 versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ — a 21.6% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ (base: 2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 7662 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7662 scores 72,298 against the Xeon Gold 6548Y+'s 73,387 — a 1.5% lead for the Xeon Gold 6548Y+. L3 cache: 256 MB on the EPYC 7662 vs 60 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6548Y+.

Feature	EPYC 7662	Xeon Gold 6548Y+
Cores / Threads	64 / 128+100%	32 / 64
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	4.1 GHz+24%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.5 GHz+25%
L3 Cache	256 MB+327%	60 MB (total)
L2 Cache	32 MB+1500%	2 MB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark	72,298	73,387+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7662 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7662 versus 5200 on the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ — the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ supports 62.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7662) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6548Y+) — the EPYC 7662 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7662) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6548Y+).

Feature	EPYC 7662	Xeon Gold 6548Y+
Socket	SP3	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200	5200+63%
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7662 rivals Xeon Platinum 8280; Xeon Gold 6548Y+ rivals EPYC 9454.

Feature	EPYC 7662	Xeon Gold 6548Y+
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7662 was priced at $6150, while the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ came in at $3726. On launch pricing ($6150 vs $3726), Xeon Gold 6548Y+ was $2424 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7662 delivers 11.8 pts/$ vs 19.7 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ — making the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ the 50.5% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7662	Xeon Gold 6548Y+
MSRP	$6150	$3726-39%
Performance per Dollar	11.8	19.7+67%
Release Date	2020	2023

Search EPYC 7662 on Amazon

Search Xeon Gold 6548Y+ on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.