EPYC 7662 vs Xeon 6730P

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7662

64 Cores128 Thrd225 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2020

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon 6730P

32 Cores64 Thrd250 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2025

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7662 vs Xeon 6730P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7662

64 / 128

72,298

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 7900

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon 6730P

32 / 64

74,113

+2.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7662 vs Xeon 6730P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7662 vs Xeon 6730P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7662

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 225W instead of 250W, a 25W reduction.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6730P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (72,298 vs 74,113).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 19.9 PassMark/$ ($6,150 MSRP vs $3,726 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon 6730P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.

Xeon 6730P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,424 less on MSRP ($3,726 MSRP vs $6,150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 69.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.9 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($3,726 MSRP vs $6,150 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6730P better than EPYC 7662?

Yes. Xeon 6730P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 9.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon 6730P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6730P is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.5% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6730P is the better buy right now. Xeon 6730P comes in $2,424 cheaper on MSRP at $3,726 MSRP versus $6,150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 69.2% better value on MSRP (19.9 vs 11.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6730P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA4710 and DDR5 instead of SP3, more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 64/128, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7662 vs Xeon 6730P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7662

The EPYC 7662 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2020-02-19. It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 32 MB. Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 72,298 points. Launch price was $6,700.

Xeon 6730P

The Xeon 6730P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 74,113 points. Launch price was $3,726.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7662 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon 6730P offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7662 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7662 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon 6730P — a 14.1% clock advantage for the Xeon 6730P (base: 2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 7662 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon 6730P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7662 scores 72,298 against the Xeon 6730P's 74,113 — a 2.5% lead for the Xeon 6730P. L3 cache: 256 MB on the EPYC 7662 vs 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6730P.

Feature	EPYC 7662	Xeon 6730P
Cores / Threads	64 / 128+100%	32 / 64
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	3.8 GHz+15%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.5 GHz+25%
L3 Cache	256 MB	288 MB (total)+13%
L2 Cache	32 MB+1500%	2 MB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	Intel 3 nm-57%
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	72,298	74,113+3%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7662 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6730P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7662 versus 6400 on the Xeon 6730P — the Xeon 6730P supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7662) vs 80 (Xeon 6730P) — the EPYC 7662 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7662) and C741 (Xeon 6730P).

Feature	EPYC 7662	Xeon 6730P
Socket	SP3	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	6400+100%
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon 6730P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7662) vs VT-x, VT-d, TDX (Xeon 6730P). Direct competitor: EPYC 7662 rivals Xeon Platinum 8280; Xeon 6730P rivals EPYC 9354.

Feature	EPYC 7662	Xeon 6730P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, TDX

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7662 was priced at $6150, while the Xeon 6730P came in at $3726. On launch pricing ($6150 vs $3726), Xeon 6730P was $2424 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7662 delivers 11.8 pts/$ vs 19.9 pts/$ for the Xeon 6730P — making the Xeon 6730P the 51.4% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7662	Xeon 6730P
MSRP	$6150	$3726-39%
Performance per Dollar	11.8	19.9+69%
Release Date	2020	2025

Search EPYC 7662 on Amazon

Search Xeon 6730P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.