
EPYC 8534P

EPYC 9384X
EPYC 8534P vs EPYC 9384X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 8534P vs EPYC 9384X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 8534P vs EPYC 9384X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 8534P
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 320W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (71,900 vs 72,121).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 768 MB).
EPYC 9384X
2023Why buy it
- ✅+500% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌60% higher power demand at 320W vs 200W.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9384X better than EPYC 8534P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 8534P vs EPYC 9384X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 8534P
The EPYC 8534P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 71,900 points. Launch price was $4,950.

EPYC 9384X
The EPYC 9384X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Genoa-X (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 72,121 points. Launch price was $5,529.
Processing Power
The EPYC 8534P packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the EPYC 9384X offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 8534P has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 8534P versus 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 9384X — a 22.9% clock advantage for the EPYC 9384X (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The EPYC 8534P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the EPYC 9384X uses Genoa-X (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8534P scores 71,900 against the EPYC 9384X's 72,121 — a 0.3% lead for the EPYC 9384X. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8534P vs 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 9384X.
| Feature | EPYC 8534P | EPYC 9384X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+100% | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.9 GHz+26% |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 3.1 GHz+35% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 768 MB (total)+500% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Siena (2023−2024) | Genoa-X (2023) |
| PassMark | 71,900 | 72,121 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,678 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,882 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 8534P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9384X uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9384X supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 1152 GB — 433.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8534P) vs 12 (EPYC 9384X). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8534P) vs 128 (EPYC 9384X) — the EPYC 9384X offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8534P) and SP5 (EPYC 9384X).
| Feature | EPYC 8534P | EPYC 9384X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP6 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1152 GB | 6144 GB+433% |
| RAM Channels | 6 | 12+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 96 | 128+33% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 8534P) vs VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9384X). Primary use case: EPYC 8534P targets Cloud Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 8534P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y; EPYC 9384X rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.
| Feature | EPYC 8534P | EPYC 9384X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | Cloud Server | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 8534P was priced at $5529, while the EPYC 9384X came in at $5529. On launch pricing ($5529 vs $5529), EPYC 9384X was $0 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8534P delivers 13.0 pts/$ vs 13.0 pts/$ for the EPYC 9384X — making the EPYC 9384X the 0.3% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 8534P | EPYC 9384X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5529 | $5529 |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.0 | 13.0 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















