
EPYC 8534P

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
EPYC 8534P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 8534P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 8534P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 8534P
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 280W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (18,882 vs 29,745).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.0 vs 30.1 PassMark/$ ($5,529 MSRP vs $2,495 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +37.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,034 less on MSRP ($2,495 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 131.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.1 vs 13.0 PassMark/$ ($2,495 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌40% higher power demand at 280W vs 200W.
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while EPYC 8534P moves to SP6 and DDR5.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX better than EPYC 8534P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 8534P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 8534P
The EPYC 8534P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 71,900 points. Launch price was $4,950.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 74,985 points. Launch price was $3,299.
Processing Power
The EPYC 8534P packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 8534P has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 8534P versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX — a 36.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 8534P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8534P scores 71,900 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX's 74,985 — a 4.2% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,678 vs 1,686, a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,882 vs 29,745 (44.7% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8534P vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX.
| Feature | EPYC 8534P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+100% | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz | 4.5 GHz+45% |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 3.6 GHz+57% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 128 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Siena (2023−2024) | Chagall PRO (2022) |
| PassMark | 71,900 | 74,985+4% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 53,977 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,678 | 1,686 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,882 | 29,745+58% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 8534P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 8534P versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX — the EPYC 8534P supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 1152 GB — 77.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8534P) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8534P) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8534P) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX).
| Feature | EPYC 8534P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP6 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+50% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1152 GB | 2048 GB+78% |
| RAM Channels | 6 | 8+33% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 96 | 128+33% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 8534P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 8534P) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX). Primary use case: EPYC 8534P targets Cloud Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 8534P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX rivals Xeon Gold 6338.
| Feature | EPYC 8534P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Cloud Server | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 8534P was priced at $5529, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX came in at $2495. On launch pricing ($5529 vs $2495), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX was $3034 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8534P delivers 13.0 pts/$ vs 30.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX the 79.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 8534P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5529 | $2495-55% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.0 | 30.1+132% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














