EPYC 9384X vs Xeon w7-3565X

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9384X

32 Cores64 Thrd320 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2023

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon w7-3565X

32 Cores64 Thrd335 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9384X vs Xeon w7-3565X Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9384X

32 / 64

72,121

+1.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 7900

Ryzen 9 9955HX

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon w7-3565X

32 / 64

70,982

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9384X vs Xeon w7-3565X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9384X vs Xeon w7-3565X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9384X

2023

Why buy it

✅+1.6% higher PassMark.
✅+830.9% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 83 MB).
✅Draws 320W instead of 335W, a 15W reduction.
✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-3565X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.0 vs 26.4 PassMark/$ ($5,529 MSRP vs $2,689 MSRP).

Xeon w7-3565X

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,840 less on MSRP ($2,689 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).
✅Delivers 102.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 26.4 vs 13.0 PassMark/$ ($2,689 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (70,982 vs 72,121).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (83 MB vs 768 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w7-3565X better than EPYC 9384X?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon w7-3565X is ahead with a 22.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9384X pulls ahead with 1.6% better PassMark. EPYC 9384X also has the bigger cache pool with 830.9% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 83 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9384X is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 830.9% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 83 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w7-3565X is the better buy right now. Xeon w7-3565X comes in $2,840 cheaper on MSRP at $2,689 MSRP versus $5,529 MSRP, and it still gives you a 22.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 9384X is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.6% better PassMark. It is also 102.4% better value on MSRP (26.4 vs 13.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w7-3565X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9384X vs Xeon w7-3565X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9384X

The EPYC 9384X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Genoa-X (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 72,121 points. Launch price was $5,529.

Xeon w7-3565X

The Xeon w7-3565X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 82.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 335 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 70,982 points. Launch price was $2,689.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 9384X and Xeon w7-3565X share an identical 32-core/64-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 9384X versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3565X — a 20.7% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-3565X (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 9384X uses the Genoa-X (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon w7-3565X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9384X scores 72,121 against the Xeon w7-3565X's 70,982 — a 1.6% lead for the EPYC 9384X. L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 9384X vs 82.5 MB on the Xeon w7-3565X.

Feature	EPYC 9384X	Xeon w7-3565X
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	32 / 64
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz	4.8 GHz+23%
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+24%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	768 MB (total)+831%	82.5 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm-29%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Genoa-X (2023)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	72,121+2%	70,982
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,300
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	19,812

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9384X uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w7-3565X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9384X supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9384X) vs 8 (Xeon w7-3565X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9384X) vs 112 (Xeon w7-3565X) — the EPYC 9384X offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9384X) and W790 (Xeon w7-3565X).

Feature	EPYC 9384X	Xeon w7-3565X
Socket	SP5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	4800	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	6144 GB+50%	4096 GB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+14%	112

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w7-3565X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9384X) vs true (Xeon w7-3565X). Direct competitor: EPYC 9384X rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Xeon w7-3565X rivals Ryzen Threadripper 7970X.

Feature	EPYC 9384X	Xeon w7-3565X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP	true

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9384X was priced at $5529, while the Xeon w7-3565X came in at $2689. On launch pricing ($5529 vs $2689), Xeon w7-3565X was $2840 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9384X delivers 13.0 pts/$ vs 26.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-3565X — making the Xeon w7-3565X the 67.7% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9384X	Xeon w7-3565X
MSRP	$5529	$2689-51%
Performance per Dollar	13.0	26.4+103%
Release Date	2023	2024

Search EPYC 9384X on Amazon

Search Xeon w7-3565X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.