EPYC 9384X vs Xeon Gold 6448H

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9384X

32 Cores64 Thrd320 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2023

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Gold 6448H

32 Cores64 Thrd250 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2023

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9384X vs Xeon Gold 6448H Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9384X

32 / 64

72,121

+2.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 7900

Ryzen 9 9955HX

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon Gold 6448H

32 / 64

70,292

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9384X vs Xeon Gold 6448H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9384X vs Xeon Gold 6448H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9384X

2023

Why buy it

✅+2.6% higher PassMark.
✅+1180% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 60 MB).
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6448H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.0 vs 19.2 PassMark/$ ($5,529 MSRP vs $3,658 MSRP).
❌28% higher power demand at 320W vs 250W.

Xeon Gold 6448H

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,871 less on MSRP ($3,658 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).
✅Delivers 47.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.2 vs 13.0 PassMark/$ ($3,658 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).
✅Draws 250W instead of 320W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (70,292 vs 72,121).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (60 MB vs 768 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6448H better than EPYC 9384X?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Gold 6448H is ahead with a 12.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9384X pulls ahead with 2.6% better PassMark. EPYC 9384X also has the bigger cache pool with 1180% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 60 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9384X is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.6% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 1180% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 60 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6448H is the better buy right now. Xeon Gold 6448H comes in $1,871 cheaper on MSRP at $3,658 MSRP versus $5,529 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 9384X is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 2.6% better PassMark. It is also 47.3% better value on MSRP (19.2 vs 13.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9384X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 1180% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 60 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 32/64. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 9384X vs Xeon Gold 6448H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9384X

The EPYC 9384X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Genoa-X (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 72,121 points. Launch price was $5,529.

Xeon Gold 6448H

The Xeon Gold 6448H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 70,292 points. Launch price was $3,658.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 9384X and Xeon Gold 6448H share an identical 32-core/64-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 9384X versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6448H — a 5% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6448H (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 9384X uses the Genoa-X (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6448H uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9384X scores 72,121 against the Xeon Gold 6448H's 70,292 — a 2.6% lead for the EPYC 9384X. L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 9384X vs 60 MB on the Xeon Gold 6448H.

Feature	EPYC 9384X	Xeon Gold 6448H
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	32 / 64
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz	4.1 GHz+5%
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+29%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	768 MB (total)+1180%	60 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm-29%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Genoa-X (2023)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	72,121+3%	70,292

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9384X uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6448H uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9384X supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9384X) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6448H). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9384X) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6448H) — the EPYC 9384X offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9384X) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6448H).

Feature	EPYC 9384X	Xeon Gold 6448H
Socket	SP5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	4800	4800
Max RAM Capacity	6144+50%	4096
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9384X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6448H). Direct competitor: EPYC 9384X rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Xeon Gold 6448H rivals EPYC 9454.

Feature	EPYC 9384X	Xeon Gold 6448H
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9384X was priced at $5529, while the Xeon Gold 6448H came in at $3658. On launch pricing ($5529 vs $3658), Xeon Gold 6448H was $1871 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9384X delivers 13.0 pts/$ vs 19.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6448H — making the Xeon Gold 6448H the 38.3% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9384X	Xeon Gold 6448H
MSRP	$5529	$3658-34%
Performance per Dollar	13.0	19.2+48%
Release Date	2023	2023

Search EPYC 9384X on Amazon

Search Xeon Gold 6448H on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.