EPYC 9384X vs Xeon Platinum 8461V

EPYC 9384X vs Xeon Platinum 8461V Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9384X

32 / 64

72,121

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 7900

Ryzen 9 9955HX

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon Platinum 8461V

48 / 96

74,982

+4.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9384X vs Xeon Platinum 8461V FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9384X vs Xeon Platinum 8461V: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9384X

2023

Why buy it

✅+687.7% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 98 MB).
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8461V across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (72,121 vs 74,982).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.0 vs 16.7 PassMark/$ ($5,529 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).

Xeon Platinum 8461V

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,038 less on MSRP ($4,491 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).
✅Delivers 28.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.7 vs 13.0 PassMark/$ ($4,491 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).
✅Draws 300W instead of 320W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (98 MB vs 768 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8461V better than EPYC 9384X?

Yes. Xeon Platinum 8461V is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Platinum 8461V is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8461V is the stronger fit. You are getting 4% better PassMark, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Platinum 8461V is the better buy right now. Xeon Platinum 8461V comes in $1,038 cheaper on MSRP at $4,491 MSRP versus $5,529 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 28.0% better value on MSRP (16.7 vs 13.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8461V makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 48 cores / 96 threads instead of 32/64. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 9384X vs Xeon Platinum 8461V Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9384X

The EPYC 9384X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Genoa-X (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 72,121 points. Launch price was $5,529.

Xeon Platinum 8461V

The Xeon Platinum 8461V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 97.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 74,982 points. Launch price was $4,491.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9384X packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8461V offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8461V has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 9384X versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8461V — a 5.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9384X (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 9384X uses the Genoa-X (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8461V uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9384X scores 72,121 against the Xeon Platinum 8461V's 74,982 — a 3.9% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8461V. L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 9384X vs 97.5 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8461V.

Feature	EPYC 9384X	Xeon Platinum 8461V
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	48 / 96+50%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+5%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+41%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	768 MB (total)+688%	97.5 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm-29%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Genoa-X (2023)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	72,121	74,982+4%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9384X uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8461V uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9384X supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9384X) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8461V). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9384X) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8461V) — the EPYC 9384X offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9384X) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8461V).

Feature	EPYC 9384X	Xeon Platinum 8461V
Socket	SP5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	4800	4800
Max RAM Capacity	6144+50%	4096
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9384X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8461V). Direct competitor: EPYC 9384X rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Xeon Platinum 8461V rivals EPYC 9454.

Feature	EPYC 9384X	Xeon Platinum 8461V
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9384X was priced at $5529, while the Xeon Platinum 8461V came in at $4491. On launch pricing ($5529 vs $4491), Xeon Platinum 8461V was $1038 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9384X delivers 13.0 pts/$ vs 16.7 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8461V — making the Xeon Platinum 8461V the 24.6% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9384X	Xeon Platinum 8461V
MSRP	$5529	$4491-19%
Performance per Dollar	13.0	16.7+28%
Release Date	2023	2023

Search EPYC 9384X on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8461V on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.