CPU
GPU
EPYC 9384X
Xeon 6730P
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9384X
Performance Per Dollar Xeon 6730P
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9384X | Xeon 6730P |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,157) | ✅ More affordable ($3,726) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Genoa-X (2023) / 5 nm) | ✨ Modern (Granite Rapids (2024−2025) / Intel 3 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9384X | Xeon 6730P |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+15%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,157) | ✅ More affordable ($3,726) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9384X and Xeon 6730P
EPYC 9384X
The EPYC 9384X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Genoa-X (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 72,121 points. Launch price was $5,529.
Xeon 6730P
The Xeon 6730P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 74,113 points. Launch price was $3,726.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 9384X and Xeon 6730P share an identical 32-core/64-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 9384X versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon 6730P — a 2.6% clock advantage for the EPYC 9384X (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 9384X uses the Genoa-X (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon 6730P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9384X scores 72,121 against the Xeon 6730P's 74,113 — a 2.7% lead for the Xeon 6730P. L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 9384X vs 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6730P.
| Feature | EPYC 9384X | Xeon 6730P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+3% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+24% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 768 MB (total)+167% | 288 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 5 nm | Intel 3 nm-40% |
| Architecture | Genoa-X (2023) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 72,121 | 74,113+3% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9384X uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6730P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9384X versus 6400 on the Xeon 6730P — the Xeon 6730P supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9384X supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9384X) vs 8 (Xeon 6730P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9384X) vs 80 (Xeon 6730P) — the EPYC 9384X offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9384X) and C741 (Xeon 6730P).
| Feature | EPYC 9384X | Xeon 6730P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | 6400+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144+50% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9384X) vs VT-x, VT-d, TDX (Xeon 6730P). Direct competitor: EPYC 9384X rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Xeon 6730P rivals EPYC 9354.
| Feature | EPYC 9384X | Xeon 6730P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP | VT-x, VT-d, TDX |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9384X launched at $5529 MSRP, while the Xeon 6730P debuted at $3726. At current prices ($4157 vs $3726), the Xeon 6730P is $431 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9384X delivers 17.3 pts/$ vs 19.9 pts/$ for the Xeon 6730P — making the Xeon 6730P the 13.6% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9384X | Xeon 6730P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5529 | $3726-33% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $4157 | $3726-10% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.3 | 19.9+15% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9384X and Xeon 6730P
