
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $699 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌2025% higher power demand at 170W vs 8W.
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 170W, a 162W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,000 vs 44,500).
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
2025Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 170W, a 162W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $699 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌2025% higher power demand at 170W vs 8W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,000 vs 44,500).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 9950X3D better than Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9950X3D | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 300 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 227 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 177 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9950X3D | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 722 FPS | 513 FPS |
| medium | 615 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 457 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 323 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 448 FPS |
| medium | 524 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 285 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 299 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 217 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9950X3D | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 893 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 725 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 647 FPS |
| ultra | 560 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 637 FPS |
| high | 514 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 516 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 431 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 387 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 322 FPS | 355 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9950X3D | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1116 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 1001 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 878 FPS | 683 FPS |
| ultra | 792 FPS | 683 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 872 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 766 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 673 FPS | 660 FPS |
| ultra | 584 FPS | 573 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 637 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 566 FPS | 511 FPS |
| high | 503 FPS | 457 FPS |
| ultra | 435 FPS | 394 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 9950X3D and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS


Ryzen 9 9950X3D
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
The Ryzen 9 9950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 70,177 points. Launch price was $699.


Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 27,318 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 9950X3D packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 9 9950X3D has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 9950X3D versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS — a 9.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 9950X3D (base: 4.3 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Ryzen 9 9950X3D uses the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 9950X3D scores 70,177 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS's 27,318 — a 87.9% lead for the Ryzen 9 9950X3D. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 44,500 vs 16,000 (94.2% advantage for the Ryzen 9 9950X3D). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,398 vs 2,605, a 26.4% lead for the Ryzen 9 9950X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 22,206 vs 10,348 (72.9% advantage for the Ryzen 9 9950X3D). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 9950X3D vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9950X3D | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+10% | 5.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.3 GHz+7% | 4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+700% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 8 MB+700% |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Granite Ridge (2024−2025) | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 70,177+157% | 27,318 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 44,500+178% | 16,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,398+30% | 2,605 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 22,206+115% | 10,348 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 9950X3D uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Ryzen 9 9950X3D supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 9950X3D) vs 20 (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS) — the Ryzen 9 9950X3D offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X670E,X670,B650E,B650 (Ryzen 9 9950X3D) and SoC (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9950X3D | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | FP7/FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+200% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24+20% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen 9 9950X3D) vs Yes (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon Graphics (2 Cores) (Ryzen 9 9950X3D) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 9950X3D rivals Core Ultra 9 285K.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9950X3D | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics (2 Cores) | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | Yes |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












