
Ryzen AI 5 330

Xeon E5-2680 v2
Ryzen AI 5 330 vs Xeon E5-2680 v2 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen AI 5 330 vs Xeon E5-2680 v2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen AI 5 330 vs Xeon E5-2680 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen AI 5 330
2025Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $317 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $667 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 91.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 36.6 vs 19.1 PassMark/$ ($350 MSRP vs $667 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 115W, a 87W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and older memory support.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2680 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2680 v2, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E5-2680 v2
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+525% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,707 vs 12,794).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.1 vs 36.6 PassMark/$ ($667 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ❌310.7% higher power demand at 115W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011, while Ryzen AI 5 330 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI 5 330 better than Xeon E5-2680 v2?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen AI 5 330 vs Xeon E5-2680 v2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen AI 5 330
The Ryzen AI 5 330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Krackan Point 2 (2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 12,794 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2680 v2
The Xeon E5-2680 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 12,707 points. Launch price was $1,260.
Processing Power
The Ryzen AI 5 330 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2680 v2 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2680 v2 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 5 330 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2680 v2 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 5 330 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen AI 5 330 uses the Krackan Point 2 (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E5-2680 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI 5 330 scores 12,794 against the Xeon E5-2680 v2's 12,707 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen AI 5 330. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Ryzen AI 5 330 vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2680 v2.
| Feature | Ryzen AI 5 330 | Xeon E5-2680 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 10 / 20+150% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+25% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.8 GHz+40% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 25 MB (total)+525% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+300% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-82% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Krackan Point 2 (2025) | Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) |
| PassMark | 12,794 | 12,707 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen AI 5 330 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2680 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen AI 5 330 | Xeon E5-2680 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 768 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 40 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen AI 5 330 was priced at $350, while the Xeon E5-2680 v2 came in at $667. On launch pricing ($350 vs $667), Ryzen AI 5 330 was $317 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen AI 5 330 delivers 36.6 pts/$ vs 19.1 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2680 v2 — making the Ryzen AI 5 330 the 63% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen AI 5 330 | Xeon E5-2680 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350-48% | $667 |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.6+92% | 19.1 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













