Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
VS
EPYC 7D12

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 vs EPYC 7D12

AMD

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

12 Cores24 Thrd55 WWMax: 5 GHz2025
VS
AMD

EPYC 7D12

32 Cores64 Thrd85 WWMax: 3 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

#49
Core i9-12900HX
MSRP: $606|Avg: N/A
115%
#57
Ryzen AI 9 365
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
105%
#64
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
100%
#73
Core i9-13950HX
MSRP: $590|Avg: $199
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7D12

#237
Xeon w3-2535
MSRP: $739|Avg: $800
107%
#239
EPYC 7313P
MSRP: $913|Avg: $824
106%
#240
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $60
106%
#241
Xeon w5-2555X
MSRP: $1069|Avg: $1145
105%
#242
Xeon E-2246G
MSRP: $311|Avg: $268
105%
#244
Xeon w3-2423
MSRP: $359|Avg: $300
104%
#245
EPYC 8434P
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $3137
104%
#247
EPYC 7443P
MSRP: $1337|Avg: $1045
100%
#248
EPYC 4564P
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $1517
100%
#249
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
MSRP: $1340|Avg: $1340
100%
#250
EPYC 7D12
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
100%
#251
Xeon W-1390P
MSRP: $594|Avg: $450
100%
#253
Xeon W-2150B
MSRP: $499|Avg: $400
97%
#255
Xeon 6517P
MSRP: $1195|Avg: $1195
97%
#257
Xeon W-1290
MSRP: $498|Avg: $300
96%
#258
EPYC 9124
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $1083
95%
#260
EPYC 4584PX
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $1517
94%
#261
Xeon w3-2435
MSRP: $669|Avg: $790
94%
#263
Xeon 6710E
MSRP: $1565|Avg: $344
93%
#264
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $180
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($100) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 7D12 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightRyzen AI Max PRO 390EPYC 7D12
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($600)
More affordable ($100)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Strix Halo (2025) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Rome (2020) / 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 ($600), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($500 less, 500% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightRyzen AI Max PRO 390EPYC 7D12
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+488%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($600)
More affordable ($100)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 and EPYC 7D12

AMD

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 43,174 points. Launch price was $499.

AMD

EPYC 7D12

The EPYC 7D12 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rome (2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 42,285 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the EPYC 7D12 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7D12 has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 7D12 — a 50% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 uses the Strix Halo (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 7D12 uses Rome (2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 scores 43,174 against the EPYC 7D12's 42,285 — a 2.1% lead for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7D12.

FeatureRyzen AI Max PRO 390EPYC 7D12
Cores / Threads
12 / 24
32 / 64+167%
Boost Clock
5 GHz+67%
3 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+191%
1.1 GHz
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)+100%
32 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+100%
512 kB (per core)
Process
4 nm-43%
7 nm
Architecture
Strix Halo (2025)
Rome (2020)
PassMark
43,174+2%
42,285
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 uses the FP11 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7D12 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 versus 3200 on the EPYC 7D12 — the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 supports 85.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7D12 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390) vs 8 (EPYC 7D12). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390) vs 128 (EPYC 7D12) — the EPYC 7D12 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Strix Halo (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390) and SP3 (EPYC 7D12).

FeatureRyzen AI Max PRO 390EPYC 7D12
Socket
FP11
SP3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
8000+150%
3200
Max RAM Capacity
128
4096+3100%
RAM Channels
4
8+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
28
128+357%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V virtualization. The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 8050S), while the EPYC 7D12 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 rivals Apple M4 Max; EPYC 7D12 rivals Xeon Gold 6248.

FeatureRyzen AI Max PRO 390EPYC 7D12
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
AMD Radeon 8050S
None
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 launched at $600 MSRP, while the EPYC 7D12 debuted at $1000. At current prices ($600 vs $100), the EPYC 7D12 is $500 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 delivers 72.0 pts/$ vs 422.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 7D12 — making the EPYC 7D12 the 141.8% better value option.

FeatureRyzen AI Max PRO 390EPYC 7D12
MSRP
$600-40%
$1000
Avg Price (30d)
$600
$100-83%
Performance per Dollar
72.0
422.9+487%
Release Date
2025
2020